Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902651›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Psychometric properties of the health literacy instrument in Brazil (HLS-EU-BR47).

Luis Saboga-Nunes, Uwe H Bittlingmayer, Stefanie Harsch, Silvana Ligia Vincenzi, Silvio Aparecido da Silva, Andréa Cristina Konrath, Lizandra Brasil Estabel, Eliane Lourdes da Silva Moro, Luciane Alves Santini, Filipe Xerxeneski da Silveira and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Luis Saboga-NunesInstitute of Sociology, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Uwe H BittlingmayerInstitute of Sociology, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Stefanie HarschInstitute of Sociology, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. stefanie.harsch@ph-freiburg.de.
Silvana Ligia VincenziFederal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Silvio Aparecido da SilvaFederal Institute of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Andréa Cristina KonrathFederal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Lizandra Brasil EstabelFederal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.
Eliane Lourdes da Silva MoroFederal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.
Luciane Alves SantiniFederal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.
Filipe Xerxeneski da SilveiraFederal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.
Darclé CardosoPrograma de pós ?graduação em odontologia em saúde coletiva, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, collective health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Roselita SeboldFederal University of Santa Catarina, Rio do Sul, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Celeste Aparecida Pereira BarbosaFederal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marta Regina FarinelliFederal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Dalton Francisco de AndradeFederal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy (HL) is a key component of health promotion and sustainability and contributes to well-being. Despite its global relevance, HL is an under-researched topic in South America but is now debuting its exploration in Brazil. To leverage its benefits for South America, the mere translation of validated tools into Portuguese is insufficient. Rather, it is necessary to examine their validity. This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the European Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-EU-BR47) using the Item Response Theory (IRT) in a population-based sample of adults in Brazil.

methodsA cross-sectional online study was conducted across Brazil and included 1028 participants aged 18 years and above (80% women). Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, factor analysis, graded responses model, Item Characteristic Curve, HL levels based on this, HL standard calculation, IRT, and regular score correlation were computed.

resultsThe instrument exhibit high reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.95). Factor analysis yielded one factor. IRT was appropriate for data analysis because it allowed quality evaluation of items and constructed a scale to quantify HL. The 47 items and latent features of respondents in the same unit of measurement are positioned in the construction of the HLS-EU-BR47 instrument. The percentages of individuals at each HL level, calculated using IRT, were found to be comparable to those obtained through the standard computation, e.g., 3.2% of people reported very low HL versus 10.8% inadequate HL, 56.2% reported low HL versus 39.5% problematic HL, 31.1% had moderate HL versus 30.1% sufficient HL, and 9.5% had high HL versus 19.7% with excellent HL. The mean HL scores were comparable between women and men (33.9 vs. 33.7, P = 0.36).

conclusionThis study provides new evidence of the validity of a widely used HL instrument for the population of South America (in this case, Brazil). This tool can be utilized by citizens, health professionals, and regional/national policymakers to inform the development of initiatives to assess and improve the HL of individuals, groups, and communities. Further studies are needed to confirm and extend the findings and to explore the influence of local cultures and practices in the vast Brazilian territory on HL.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPsychometricsAdolescentAdultAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultGradual response modelHealth literacyItem response theoryValidity of the instrument, measurement scale of health literacy, Brazil

Identifiers

PMID38902651
PMCPMC11191178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.