ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2024
Provocation of attacks to discover migraine signaling mechanisms and new drug targets: early history and future perspectives - a narrative review.
Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide induces headache attacks in people with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Sildenafil provokes headache but not migraine in men with migraine without aura: a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- Morning Headaches as a Specific Obstructive Sleep Apnea Characteristic in a Large Sleep Clinic Population.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sexual dimorphism in cortical excitability: repetitive nitroglycerin unmasks maladaptive spreading depolarization in female mice.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Hypothalamic and sex-related hormones in migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Fecal amino acid and short-chain fatty acid profiles in children with migraine: a targeted metabolomics study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Is canonical SD a clinically relevant model of migraine? Argument con.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 2- Tension-type headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Revisiting substance P in migraine: a methodological approach inspired by anti-CGRP and anti-PACAP success.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- fMRI Insights into Visual Cortex Dysfunction as a Biomarker for Migraine with Aura.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Migraine in men.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Neurogasobiology of migraine: Carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, and nitric oxide as emerging pathophysiological trinacrium relevant to nociception regulation.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Review
- Cerebral blood flow and arterial responses in migraine: history and future perspectives.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe development of several experimental migraine provocation models has significantly contributed to an understanding of the signaling mechanisms of migraine. The early history of this development and a view to the future are presented as viewed by the inventor of the models.
methodsExtensive knowledge of the literature was supplemented by scrutiny of reference lists.
resultsEarly studies used methodologies that were not blinded. They suggested that histamine and nitroglycerin (Glyceryl trinitrate, GTN) could induce headache and perhaps migraine. The development of a double blind, placebo-controlled model, and the use of explicit diagnostic criteria for induced migraine was a major step forward. GTN, donor of nitric oxide (NO), induced headache in people with- and without migraine as well as delayed migraine attacks in those with migraine. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) did the same, supporting the development of CGRP antagonists now widely used in patients. Likewise, pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) provoked headache and migraine. Recently a PACAP antibody has shown anti migraine activity in a phase 2 trial. Increase of second messengers activated by NO, CGRP and PACAP effectively induced migraine. The experimental models have also been used in other types of headaches and have been combined with imaging and biochemical studies. They have also been used for drug testing and in genetic studies.
conclusionConclusion. Human migraine provocation models have informed about signaling mechanisms of migraine leading to new drugs and drug targets. Future use of these models in imaging-, biochemistry- and genetic studies as well as in the further study of animal models is promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.