Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902598›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2024

Exploring potential neuroimaging biomarkers for the response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in episodic migraine.

Heng-Le Wei, Yu-Sheng Yu, Meng-Yao Wang, Gang-Ping Zhou, Junrong Li, Hong Zhang, Zhengyang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Endogenous treatments for migraine pain.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heng-Le Wei *Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yu-Sheng Yu *Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.169, Hushan Road, Nanjing, China.
Meng-Yao WangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.169, Hushan Road, Nanjing, China.
Gang-Ping ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.169, Hushan Road, Nanjing, China.
Junrong LiDepartment of Neurology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. ljry612@163.com.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.169, Hushan Road, Nanjing, China. jnyyfsk@126.com.
Zhengyang ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. zyzhou@nju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered first-line medications for acute migraine attacks. However, the response exhibits considerable variability among individuals. Thus, this study aimed to explore a machine learning model based on the percentage of amplitude oscillations (PerAF) and gray matter volume (GMV) to predict the response to NSAIDs in migraine treatment.

methodsPropensity score matching was adopted to match patients having migraine with response and nonresponse to NSAIDs, ensuring consistency in clinical characteristics and migraine-related features. Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging was employed to extract PerAF and GMV, followed by feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and recursive feature elimination algorithms. Multiple predictive models were constructed and the final model with the smallest predictive residuals was chosen. The model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROCAUC) curve, area under the precision-recall curve (PRAUC), balance accuracy (BACC), sensitivity, F1 score, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). External validation was performed using a public database. Then, correlation analysis was performed between the neuroimaging predictors and clinical features in migraine.

resultsOne hundred eighteen patients with migraine (59 responders and 59 non-responders) were enrolled. Six features (PerAF of left insula and left transverse temporal gyrus; and GMV of right superior frontal gyrus, left postcentral gyrus, right postcentral gyrus, and left precuneus) were observed. The random forest model with the lowest predictive residuals was selected and model metrics (ROCAUC, PRAUC, BACC, sensitivity, F1 score, PPV, and NPV) in the training and testing groups were 0.982, 0.983, 0.927, 0.976, 0.930, 0.889, and 0.973; and 0.711, 0.648, 0.639, 0.667,0.649, 0.632, and 0.647, respectively. The model metrics of external validation were 0.631, 0.651, 0.611, 0.808, 0.656, 0.553, and 0.706. Additionally, a significant positive correlation was found between the GMV of the left precuneus and attack time in non-responders.

conclusionsOur findings suggest the potential of multimodal neuroimaging features in predicting the efficacy of NSAIDs in migraine treatment and provide novel insights into the neural mechanisms underlying migraine and its optimized treatment strategy.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalGray MatterMagnetic Resonance ImagingMigraine DisordersNeuroimagingAdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiomarkersMachine learningMigraineMultimodal magnetic resonance imagingNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsPercentage of amplitude oscillations

Identifiers

PMID38902598
PMCPMC11191194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.