Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902585›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology letters2024

Machine learning: an advancement in biochemical engineering.

Ritika Saha, Ashutosh Chauhan, Smita Rastogi Verma

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ritika SahaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, 110042, India.
Ashutosh ChauhanDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, 110042, India.
Smita Rastogi VermaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, 110042, India. smitar@dtu.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3812-5314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most remarkable techniques recently introduced into the field of bioprocess engineering is machine learning. Bioprocess engineering has drawn much attention due to its vast application in different domains like biopharmaceuticals, fossil fuel alternatives, environmental remediation, and food and beverage industry, etc. However, due to their unpredictable mechanisms, they are very often challenging to optimize. Furthermore, biological systems are extremely complicated; hence, machine learning algorithms could potentially be utilized to improve and build new biotechnological processes. Gaining insight into the fundamental mathematical understanding of commonly used machine learning algorithms, including Support Vector Machine, Principal Component Analysis, Partial Least Squares and Reinforcement Learning, the present study aims to discuss various case studies related to the application of machine learning in bioprocess engineering. Recent advancements as well as challenges posed in this area along with their potential solutions are also presented.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsBioengineeringBiotechnologyDeep learningMachine learningPartial least squaresPrincipal component analysisReinforcement learningSupport vector machine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.