Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902496›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Automatic classification of normal and abnormal cell division using deep learning.

Pablo Delgado-Rodriguez, Rodrigo Morales Sánchez, Elouan Rouméas-Noël, François Paris, Arrate Munoz-Barrutia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pablo Delgado-RodriguezUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain.
Rodrigo Morales SánchezUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain.
Elouan Rouméas-NoëlCentre Régional de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Intégré Nantes-Angers, Nantes, France.
François ParisCentre Régional de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Intégré Nantes-Angers, Nantes, France.
Arrate Munoz-BarrutiaUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain. mamunozb@ing.uc3m.es.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades FPU19/02854Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2019- 109820RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a surge in the development of methods for cell segmentation and tracking, with initiatives like the Cell Tracking Challenge driving progress in the field. Most studies focus on regular cell population videos in which cells are segmented and followed, and parental relationships annotated. However, DNA damage induced by genotoxic drugs or ionizing radiation produces additional abnormal events since it leads to behaviors like abnormal cell divisions (resulting in a number of daughters different from two) and cell death. With this in mind, we developed an automatic mitosis classifier to categorize small mitosis image sequences centered around one cell as "Normal" or "Abnormal." These mitosis sequences were extracted from videos of cell populations exposed to varying levels of radiation that affect the cell cycle's development. We explored several deep-learning architectures and found that a network with a ResNet50 backbone and including a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) layer produced the best results (mean F1-score: 0.93 ± 0.06). In the future, we plan to integrate this classifier with cell segmentation and tracking to build phylogenetic trees of the population after genomic stress.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionDeep LearningMitosisCell TrackingHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID38902496
PMCPMC11189926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.