Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902493›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer through the integration of serum tumor markers and hematological indicators with machine learning algorithms.

Rongxuan Xu, Huimin Chi, Qian Zhang, Xiaofeng Li, Zhijun Hong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rongxuan XuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Huimin ChiDalian Medical Association, Dian, China.
Qian ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Xiaofeng LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. lxf_chen@dmu.edu.cn.
Zhijun HongThe Health Management Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China. happyday246@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-7570

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2022-MS-320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate due to a low rate of early diagnosis. Therefore, efficient diagnostic methods are urgently needed. PURPOSE: This study assesses the diagnostic effectiveness of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) serum tumor markers for colorectal cancer (CRC) and investigates a machine learning-based diagnostic model incorporating these markers with blood biochemical indices for improved CRC detection.

methodBetween January 2019 and December 2021, data from 800 CRC patients and 697 controls were collected; 52 patients and 63 controls attending the same hospital in 2022 were collected as an external validation set. Markers' effectiveness was analyzed individually and collectively, using metrics like ROC curve AUC and F1 score. Variables chosen through backward regression, including demographics and blood tests, were tested on six machine learning models using these metrics.

resultIn the case group, the levels of CEA, CA199, and CA125 were found to be higher than those in the control group. Combining these with a fourth serum marker significantly improved predictive efficacy over using any single marker alone, achieving an Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.801. Using stepwise regression (backward), 17 variables were meticulously selected for evaluation in six machine learning models. Among these models, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) emerged as the top performer in the training set, test set, and external validation set, boasting an AUC value of over 0.9, indicating its superior predictive power.

conclusionMachine learning models integrating tumor markers and blood indices offer superior CRC diagnostic accuracy, potentially enhancing clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overalpha-FetoproteinsAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateCA-125 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenFemaleHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle Agedalpha-FetoproteinsAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 Antigencarbohydrate antigen 199, humanCarcinoembryonic AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, humanBlood biochemical indicesColorectal cancer diagnosisDiagnostic model optimizationMachine learning algorithmsSerum tumor markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.