Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902477›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

Development and validation of a smartphone-based deep-learning-enabled system to detect middle-ear conditions in otoscopic images.

Constance Dubois, David Eigen, François Simon, Vincent Couloigner, Michael Gormish, Martin Chalumeau, Laurent Schmoll, Jérémie F Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep Learning in Otolaryngology: A Narrative Review.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  7. Deep Learning-Assisted Prediction of Hearing Outcomes After Anatomically Successful Type I Tympanoplasty.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Constance DuboisInserm UMR1153 (CRESS), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8479-8309
David EigenClarifai, New York, NY, USA.
François SimonDepartment of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Necker-Enfants malades Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Vincent CouloignerDepartment of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Necker-Enfants malades Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Michael GormishClarifai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2720-8762
Martin ChalumeauInserm UMR1153 (CRESS), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Laurent SchmollNeMo Health, Strasbourg, France.
Jérémie F CohenInserm UMR1153 (CRESS), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France. jeremie.cohen@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-8985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle-ear conditions are common causes of primary care visits, hearing impairment, and inappropriate antibiotic use. Deep learning (DL) may assist clinicians in interpreting otoscopic images. This study included patients over 5 years old from an ambulatory ENT practice in Strasbourg, France, between 2013 and 2020. Digital otoscopic images were obtained using a smartphone-attached otoscope (Smart Scope, Karl Storz, Germany) and labeled by a senior ENT specialist across 11 diagnostic classes (reference standard). An Inception-v2 DL model was trained using 41,664 otoscopic images, and its diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by calculating class-specific estimates of sensitivity and specificity. The model was then incorporated into a smartphone app called i-Nside. The DL model was evaluated on a validation set of 3,962 images and a held-out test set comprising 326 images. On the validation set, all class-specific estimates of sensitivity and specificity exceeded 98%. On the test set, the DL model achieved a sensitivity of 99.0% (95% confidence interval: 94.5-100) and a specificity of 95.2% (91.5-97.6) for the binary classification of normal vs. abnormal images; wax plugs were detected with a sensitivity of 100% (94.6-100) and specificity of 97.7% (95.0-99.1); other class-specific estimates of sensitivity and specificity ranged from 33.3% to 92.3% and 96.0% to 100%, respectively. We present an end-to-end DL-enabled system able to achieve expert-level diagnostic accuracy for identifying normal tympanic aspects and wax plugs within digital otoscopic images. However, the system's performance varied for other middle-ear conditions. Further prospective validation is necessary before wider clinical deployment.

Identifiers

PMID38902477
PMCPMC11189910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.