Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902371›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Common dietary emulsifiers promote metabolic disorders and intestinal microbiota dysbiosis in mice.

Suraphan Panyod, Wei-Kai Wu, Chih-Ting Chang, Naohisa Wada, Han-Chen Ho, Yi-Ling Lo, Sing-Ping Tsai, Rou-An Chen, Huai-Syuan Huang, Po-Yu Liu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Edible Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diet's impact on gut microbial assemblage in health and disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Suraphan Panyod *Institute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0001-8998-375X
Wei-Kai Wu *Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0002-9476-8998
Chih-Ting ChangInstitute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Naohisa WadaBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0001-5949-9115
Han-Chen HoDepartment of Anatomy, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0002-8638-9760
Yi-Ling LoDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Sing-Ping TsaiDepartment of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Rou-An ChenInstitute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Huai-Syuan HuangInstitute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Po-Yu LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0003-1290-0850
Yi-Hsun ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsiao-Li ChuangNational Laboratory Animal Center, National Applied Research Laboratories, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Ting-Chin David ShenDivision of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sen-Lin TangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0002-5852-972X
Chi-Tang HoDepartment of Food Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Ming-Shiang WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. mingshiang@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0002-1940-6428
Lee-Yan SheenInstitute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. lysheen@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-652X

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan) 106-3114-B-002-003Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan) 107-2321-B-002-017Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan) 107-2321-B-002-039Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan) 108-2321-B-002-051Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan) 109-2314-B-002-064-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan) 109-2314-B-002-103-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan) 109-2327-B-002-005Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan) 110-2327-B-002-007Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan) 111-2327-B-002-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary emulsifiers are linked to various diseases. The recent discovery of the role of gut microbiota-host interactions on health and disease warrants the safety reassessment of dietary emulsifiers through the lens of gut microbiota. Lecithin, sucrose fatty acid esters, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), and mono- and diglycerides (MDG) emulsifiers are common dietary emulsifiers with high exposure levels in the population. This study demonstrates that sucrose fatty acid esters and carboxymethylcellulose induce hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in a mouse model. Lecithin, sucrose fatty acid esters, and CMC disrupt glucose homeostasis in the in vitro insulin-resistance model. MDG impairs circulating lipid and glucose metabolism. All emulsifiers change the intestinal microbiota diversity and induce gut microbiota dysbiosis. Lecithin, sucrose fatty acid esters, and CMC do not impact mucus-bacterial interactions, whereas MDG tends to cause bacterial encroachment into the inner mucus layer and enhance inflammation potential by raising circulating lipopolysaccharide. Our findings demonstrate the safety concerns associated with using dietary emulsifiers, suggesting that they could lead to metabolic syndromes.

Indexed as

DysbiosisEmulsifying AgentsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetabolic DiseasesAnimalsCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumInsulin ResistanceLecithinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSucroseCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumEmulsifying AgentsLecithinsSucrose

Identifiers

PMID38902371
PMCPMC11190199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.