Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902370›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Speech prosody enhances the neural processing of syntax.

Giulio Degano, Peter W Donhauser, Laura Gwilliams, Paola Merlo, Narly Golestani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How Low-Frequency Neural Activity Structures Language in Time.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  6. A distinct set of brain areas process prosody-the melody of speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulio DeganoDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. giulio.degano@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1540-780X
Peter W DonhauserErnst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Laura GwilliamsDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9213-588X
Paola MerloDepartment of Linguistics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-4498
Narly GolestaniDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7388-4714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human language relies on the correct processing of syntactic information, as it is essential for successful communication between speakers. As an abstract level of language, syntax has often been studied separately from the physical form of the speech signal, thus often masking the interactions that can promote better syntactic processing in the human brain. However, behavioral and neural evidence from adults suggests the idea that prosody and syntax interact, and studies in infants support the notion that prosody assists language learning. Here we analyze a MEG dataset to investigate how acoustic cues, specifically prosody, interact with syntactic representations in the brains of native English speakers. More specifically, to examine whether prosody enhances the cortical encoding of syntactic representations, we decode syntactic phrase boundaries directly from brain activity, and evaluate possible modulations of this decoding by the prosodic boundaries. Our findings demonstrate that the presence of prosodic boundaries improves the neural representation of phrase boundaries, indicating the facilitative role of prosodic cues in processing abstract linguistic features. This work has implications for interactive models of how the brain processes different linguistic features. Future research is needed to establish the neural underpinnings of prosody-syntax interactions in languages with different typological characteristics.

Indexed as

LanguageSpeech PerceptionAdultBrainCuesFemaleHumansLinguisticsMagnetoencephalographyMaleSpeechYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38902370
PMCPMC11190187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.