SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Comprehensive Systematic Review of Poly-L-lactic Acid in Facial Clinical Application.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Poly-L-Lactic Acid Combined With COJournal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- Regenerative Functional Microspheres for Aesthetic Medicine: Mechanism, Materials, Fabrication, and Clinical Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- The Management of Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA) Nodules: A Scoping Review and Evidence-Mapped Clinical Pathway.Cureus · 2026Review
- Proportion of Adverse Events of Injectable Collagen Biostimulators After Facial Aesthetic Treatment: A Systematic Review Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of an Innovative Poly-L-Lactic Acid (LASYNPRO) in Facial Rejuvenation: Prospective, Multicenter Spanish Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- Preparation of Uniform PEG-PLLA Microspheres via Membrane Emulsification for Soft Tissue Filling Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Integrative Aesthetics: Shaping the Emerging Frontier of Modern Aesthetic Medicine.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Systematic Review of Poly-L-Lactic Acid in Facial Clinical Application.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical Perspectives on the Safety Profile of Poly-L-Lactic Acid (Juläine): Results From a National Survey.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Advances in Anti-aging Procedures: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical and Non-surgical Rejuvenation Techniques.Cureus · 2025Review
- Comparative Analysis of Reconstitution and Solubility of Two Poly-L-Lactic Acid Fillers for Medical Applications.Polymers · 2025Article
- Facial Rejuvenation With an Innovative Poly-l-Lactic Acid (Juläine) for Nasolabial Folds: Interim Data Analysis of a Prospective, Non-Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Spanish Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Poly-lactic Acid Dermal Filler Enriched With InCubeIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWith the increasing global clinical application of regenerative injection materials, there is a growing recognition of the crucial role played by poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA). The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of PLLA in clinical applications for facial treatments.
methodsWe conducted a search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases, followed by screening of the retrieved articles based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then performed an analysis on the final set of included articles that met our inclusion criteria. Within these included articles, quality assessment for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was carried out using the Jadad scale, while non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) were evaluated using the MINORS scale.
resultsOur search of above database, using the relevant search terms, yielded a total of 1300 PLLA-related articles. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1280 articles were excluded. Only 20 articles, 16 in English and 4 in Chinese, were included in our final analysis, among them 16 NRCTs and 4 RCTs. According to the different clinical evaluation standards, the treatment of PLLA has achieved good outcomes. Most PLLA injection-related adverse events are mild and self-limited, without any additional treatment requirement.
conclusionPLLA is a reasonably safe and effective facial injection material that can be applied in different facial injection areas and depth using various reconstitute and injection methods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
38902341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.