Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902314›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Indirect prediction of graphene nanoplatelets-reinforced cementitious composites compressive strength by using machine learning approaches.

Muhammad Fawad, Hisham Alabduljabbar, Furqan Farooq, Taoufik Najeh, Yaser Gamil, Bilal Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad FawadDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland. Muhammad.Fawad@polsl.pl.
Hisham AlabduljabbarDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Furqan FarooqNUST Institute of Civil Engineering (NICE), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (SCEE), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Sector H-12, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Taoufik NajehOperation and Maintenance, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden. taoufik.najeh@ltu.se.
Yaser GamilDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
Bilal AhmedDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene nanoplatelets (GrNs) emerge as promising conductive fillers to significantly enhance the electrical conductivity and strength of cementitious composites, contributing to the development of highly efficient composites and the advancement of non-destructive structural health monitoring techniques. However, the complexities involved in these nanoscale cementitious composites are markedly intricate. Conventional regression models encounter limitations in fully understanding these intricate compositions. Thus, the current study employed four machine learning (ML) methods such as decision tree (DT), categorical boosting machine (CatBoost), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) to establish strong prediction models for compressive strength (CS) of graphene nanoplatelets-based materials. An extensive dataset containing 172 data points was gathered from published literature for model development. The majority portion (70%) of the database was utilized for training the model while 30% was used for validating the model efficacy on unseen data. Different metrics were employed to assess the performance of the established ML models. In addition, SHapley Additve explanation (SHAP) for model interpretability. The DT, CatBoost, LightGBM, and ANFIS models exhibited excellent prediction efficacy with R-values of 0.8708, 0.9999, 0.9043, and 0.8662, respectively. While all the suggested models demonstrated acceptable accuracy in predicting compressive strength, the CatBoost model exhibited exceptional prediction efficiency. Furthermore, the SHAP analysis provided that the thickness of GrN plays a pivotal role in GrNCC, significantly influencing CS and consequently exhibiting the highest SHAP value of + 9.39. The diameter of GrN, curing age, and w/c ratio are also prominent features in estimating the strength of graphene nanoplatelets-based cementitious materials. This research underscores the efficacy of ML methods in accurately forecasting the characteristics of concrete reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets, providing a swift and economical substitute for laborious experimental procedures. It is suggested that to improve the generalization of the study, more inputs with increased datasets should be considered in future studies.

Indexed as

Compressive strengthGraphene nanoplateletsMachine learningPrediction modelsSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID38902314
PMCPMC11189940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.