Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38902297›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2024

Effects of wall materials on the physicochemical properties of spray-dried bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) powders.

Yuanyuan Deng, Guang Liu, Huimin Zhang, Pengfei Zhou, Xiaojun Tang, Ping Li, Zhihao Zhao, Yan Zhang, Zhangying Wang, Zhencheng Wei and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuanyuan Deng *Sericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China.
Guang Liu *Sericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China.
Huimin ZhangSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China.
Pengfei ZhouSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China.
Xiaojun TangSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China.
Ping LiSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China.
Zhihao ZhaoSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China.
Yan ZhangSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China.
Zhangying WangCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Zhencheng WeiSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China. zhencheng_wei@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-0302
Mingwei ZhangSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou, 510610, China. mwzhh@vip.tom.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bitter gourd has numerous health-promoting effects on the human body. However, its use has been greatly limited due to its poor acceptance by consumers, resulting from its strong bitterness. This study investigated the effects of five wall materials, namely, soybean protein isolate, gum arabic, maltodextrin, resistant starch, and a soybean lecithin calcium caseinate mixture, on the physicochemical properties of spray-dried bitter gourd powders. The results showed that all five wall materials reduced the moisture content, water activity, browning degree, agglomeration, and bitterness of the spray-dried bitter gourd powder. Maltodextrin was found to be the most effective at reducing water activity, while soybean protein isolate was best at protecting the colour, and the soybean lecithin calcium caseinate mixture was best at reducing hygroscopicity and masking bitterness. Additionally, all five wall materials improved the preservation of flavonoids, saponins, and vitamin C, with soybean protein isolate being the most effective in improving the total flavonoid retention ratio and the soybean lecithin calcium caseinate mixture being the best in improving the retention ratios of total saponins and vitamin C. The spray-dried bitter gourd powder prepared with soybean protein isolate had the highest antioxidant activity and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. These results are significant for understanding the relationship between wall materials and the physicochemical properties of spray-dried powder. Additionally, these materials provide bitter gourd product manufacturers with useful guidance for producing high-quality products. Furthermore, the results could provide useful insights for processing fruits with similar product characteristics, thus contributing to the enrichment of food processing knowledge.

Identifiers

PMID38902297
PMCPMC11190200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.