ArticleSeminars in oncology nursing2024
The Use of Novel Instrumented Socks to Detect Changes in Daily Life Mobility During an Exercise Intervention in Prostate Cancer Survivors Treated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy.
Article in Seminars in oncology nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo describe changes in daily life mobility in prostate cancer survivors treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) after a 6-month exercise intervention using novel instrumented socks and to identify characteristics of participants who exhibited changes in daily life mobility.
methodsA subset of participants in a fall prevention exercise trial completed objective tests and patient-reported surveys of physical functioning, and wore instrumented socks for up to 7 days to measure daily life mobility. Changes in cadence, double support proportion, and pitch angle of the foot at toe-off were selected as measures of daily life mobility previously found to be different in men exposed to ADT for prostate cancer versus controls. Daily life mobility was compared from baseline to 6 months using paired t-tests. Characteristics of responders who improved their daily life mobility were compared to nonresponders using two-sample t-tests, Chi-squared proportion tests, or Fisher's Exact Tests.
resultsOur sample included 35 prostate cancer survivors (mean age 71.6 ± 7.8 years). Mean cadence, double support proportion, and pitch angle at toe-off did not change significantly over 6 months of exercise, but 14 participants (40%) improved in at least two of three daily life mobility measures ("responders"). Responders were characterized by lower physical functioning, lower cadence in daily life, fewer comorbidities, and better social and mental/emotional functioning.
conclusionsCertain daily life mobility measures potentially impacted by ADT could be measured with instrumented socks and improved by exercise. Men who start with lower physical functioning and better social and mental/emotional functioning appear most likely to benefit, possibly because they have more to gain from exercise and are able to engage in a 6-month intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Technology-based approaches could provide nurses with an objective measure of daily life mobility for patients with chronic illness and detect who is responding to rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.