Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38901597›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2024

A multi-tiered approach to assess fecal pollution in an urban watershed: Bacterial and viral indicators and sediment microbial communities.

Stephanie D Friedman, Emilie Cooper, Aaron Blackwell, Mark A Elliott, Michael Weinstein, Jared Cara, Yongshan Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie D FriedmanUS Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Gulf Breeze, FL, USA. Electronic address: friedman.stephanie@epa.gov.
Emilie CooperUS Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Gulf Breeze, FL, USA.
Aaron BlackwellDepartment of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Mark A ElliottDepartment of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Michael WeinsteinZymo Research Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jared CaraZymo Research Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA.
Yongshan WanUS Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Gulf Breeze, FL, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of effective pollution mitigation strategies require an understanding of the pollution sources and factors influencing fecal pollution loading. Fecal contamination of Turkey Creek in Gulfport, Mississippi, one of the nation's most endangered creeks, was studied through a multi-tiered approach. Over a period of approximately two years, four stations across the watershed were analyzed for nutrients, enumeration of E. coli, male-specific coliphages and bioinformatic analysis of sediment microbial communities. The results demonstrated that two stations, one adjacent to a lift station and one just upstream from the wastewater-treatment plant, were the most impacted. The station adjacent to land containing a few livestock was the least impaired. While genotyping of male-specific coliphage viruses generally revealed a mixed viral signature (human and other animals), fecal contamination at the station near the wastewater treatment plant exhibited predominant impact by municipal sewage. Fecal indicator loadings were positively associated with antecedent rainfall for three of four stations. No associations were noted between fecal indicator loadings and any of the nutrients. Taxonomic signatures of creek sediment were unique to each sample station, but the sediment microbial community did overlap somewhat following major rain events. No presence of Escherichia coli (E. coli) or enterococci were found in the sediment. At some of the stations it was evident that rainfall was not always the primary driver of fecal transport. Repeated monitoring and analysis of a variety of parameters presented in this study determined that point and non-point sources of fecal pollution varied spatially in association with treated and/or untreated sewage.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringEscherichia coliFecesGeologic SedimentsColiphagesMicrobiotaMississippiWater MicrobiologyWater PollutionColiphageFecal pollutionMicrobial source-trackingTime series 16S rRNA microbial community

Identifiers

PMID38901597
PMCPMC11247622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.