Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38901273›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2024

An algorithm to detect dicrotic notch in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography waveforms using the iterative envelope mean method.

Ravi Pal, Akos Rudas, Sungsoo Kim, Jeffrey N Chiang, Anna Barney, Maxime Cannesson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ravi PalDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Akos RudasDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sungsoo KimDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey N ChiangDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anna BarneyInstitute of Sound and Vibration Research (ISVR), University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Maxime CannessonDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: mcannesson@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

Machine Learning of Physiological Waveforms and Electronic Health Record Data to Predict, Diagnose, and Treat Hemodynamic Instability in Surgical PatientsR01HL144692 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Biomedical Informatics Tools for Applied Perioperative PhysiologyR01EB029751 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
Personalized Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection of Postoperative Failure to RescueR01EB035028 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Maxime Cannesson · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144692NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029751NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB035028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDetection of the dicrotic notch (DN) within a cardiac cycle is essential for assessment of cardiac output, calculation of pulse wave velocity, estimation of left ventricular ejection time, and supporting feature-based machine learning models for noninvasive blood pressure estimation, and hypotension, or hypertension prediction. In this study, we present a new algorithm based on the iterative envelope mean (IEM) method to detect automatically the DN in arterial blood pressure (ABP) and photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms.

methodsThe algorithm was evaluated on both ABP and PPG waveforms from a large perioperative dataset (MLORD dataset) comprising 17,327 patients. The analysis involved a total of 1,171,288 cardiac cycles for ABP waveforms and 3,424,975 cardiac cycles for PPG waveforms. To evaluate the algorithm's performance, the systolic phase duration (SPD) was employed, which represents the duration from the onset of the systolic phase to the DN in the cardiac cycle. Correlation plots and regression analysis were used to compare the algorithm against marked DN detection, while box plots and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare its performance with both marked DN detection and an established DN detection technique (second derivative). The marking of the DN temporal location was carried out by an experienced researcher using the help of the 'find_peaks' function from the scipy Python package, serving as a reference for the evaluation. The marking was visually validated by both an engineer and an anesthesiologist. The robustness of the algorithm was evaluated as the DN was made less visually distinct across signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) ranging from -30 dB to -5 dB in both ABP and PPG waveforms.

resultsThe correlation between SPD estimated by the algorithm and that marked by the researcher is strong for both ABP (R

conclusionOur proposed IEM- based algorithm can detect DN in both ABP and PPG waveforms with low computational cost, even in cases where it is not distinctly defined within a cardiac cycle of the waveform ('DN-less signals'). The algorithm can potentially serve as a valuable, fast, and reliable tool for extracting features from ABP and PPG waveforms. It can be especially beneficial in medical applications where DN-based features, such as SPD, diastolic phase duration, and DN amplitude, play a significant role.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPhotoplethysmographyArterial PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationHumansPulse Wave AnalysisSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedArterial blood pressure (ABP) waveformsDicrotic notch (DN)Iterative envelope mean (IEM) methodPhotoplethysmography (PPG) waveformsSystolic phase duration (SPD)

Identifiers

PMID38901273
PMCPMC11323035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.