Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38901146›Full record

ReviewEBioMedicine2024

A computational framework to improve cross-platform implementation of transcriptomics signatures.

Louis Kreitmann, Giselle D'Souza, Luca Miglietta, Ortensia Vito, Heather R Jackson, Dominic Habgood-Coote, Michael Levin, Alison Holmes, Myrsini Kaforou, Jesus Rodriguez-Manzano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Translational cancer research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Whole blood ratio ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Louis KreitmannSection of Adult Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom; Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Giselle D'SouzaSection of Adult Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom; Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom; Section of Paediatric Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom; Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Luca MigliettaSection of Adult Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom; Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Ortensia VitoSection of Paediatric Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom; Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Heather R JacksonSection of Paediatric Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom; Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Dominic Habgood-CooteSection of Paediatric Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom; Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Michael LevinSection of Paediatric Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom; Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Alison HolmesSection of Adult Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom; Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Myrsini KaforouSection of Paediatric Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom; Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Jesus Rodriguez-ManzanoSection of Adult Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom; Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.rodriguez-manzano@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of next-generation sequencing technologies and computational advances have expanded our understanding of gene expression regulation (i.e., the transcriptome). This has also led to an increased interest in using transcriptomic biomarkers to improve disease diagnosis and stratification, to assess prognosis and predict the response to treatment. Significant progress in identifying transcriptomic signatures for various clinical needs has been made, with large discovery studies accounting for challenges such as patient variability, unwanted batch effects, and data complexities; however, obstacles related to the technical aspects of cross-platform implementation still hinder the successful integration of transcriptomic technologies into standard diagnostic workflows. In this article, we discuss the challenges associated with integrating transcriptomic signatures derived using high-throughput technologies (such as RNA-sequencing) into clinical diagnostic tools using nucleic acid amplification (NAA) techniques. The novelty of the proposed approach lies in our aim to embed constraints related to cross-platform implementation in the process of signature discovery. These constraints could include technical limitations of amplification platform and chemistry, the maximal number of targets imposed by the chosen multiplexing strategy, and the genomic context of identified RNA biomarkers. Finally, we propose to build a computational framework that would integrate these constraints in combination with existing statistical and machine learning models used for signature identification. We envision that this could accelerate the integration of RNA signatures discovered by high-throughput technologies into NAA-based approaches suitable for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingTranscriptomeBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersDiagnosticsHost-responseMolecular testMultiplex PCRNucleic acid amplification techniquesPCR-based technologiesRNA sequencingTranscriptomic signatures

Identifiers

PMID38901146
PMCPMC11245942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.