Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900978›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024

Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification by Digital Histopathology and Deep Learning.

Yanan Shao, Roozbeh Bazargani, Davood Karimi, Jane Wang, Ladan Fazli, S Larry Goldenberg, Martin E Gleave, Peter C Black, Ali Bashashati, Septimiu Salcudean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yanan ShaoElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Roozbeh BazarganiElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-7197-2953
Davood KarimiRadiology, Harvard and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Jane WangElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ladan FazliThe Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
S Larry GoldenbergThe Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Martin E GleaveThe Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Peter C BlackThe Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2919-7068
Ali BashashatiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4212-7224
Septimiu SalcudeanElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate cancer (PCa) represents a highly heterogeneous disease that requires tools to assess oncologic risk and guide patient management and treatment planning. Current models are based on various clinical and pathologic parameters including Gleason grading, which suffers from a high interobserver variability. In this study, we determine whether objective machine learning (ML)-driven histopathology image analysis would aid us in better risk stratification of PCa. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe propose a deep learning, histopathology image-based risk stratification model that combines clinicopathologic data along with hematoxylin and eosin- and Ki-67-stained histopathology images. We train and test our model, using a five-fold cross-validation strategy, on a data set from 502 treatment-naïve PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2000 and 2012.

resultsWe used the concordance index as a measure to evaluate the performance of various risk stratification models. Our risk stratification model on the basis of convolutional neural networks demonstrated superior performance compared with Gleason grading and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Post-Surgical risk stratification models. Using our model, 3.9% of the low-risk patients were correctly reclassified to be high-risk and 21.3% of the high-risk patients were correctly reclassified as low-risk.

conclusionThese findings highlight the importance of ML as an objective tool for histopathology image assessment and patient risk stratification. With further validation on large cohorts, the digital pathology risk classification we propose may be helpful in guiding administration of adjuvant therapy including radiotherapy after RP.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeoplasm GradingProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedProstatectomyRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID38900978
PMCPMC11371114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.