Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900940›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2024

Optional Exam Retakes Reduce Anxiety but may Exacerbate Score Disparities Between Students with Different Social Identities.

K Supriya, Christofer Bang, Jessica Ebie, Christopher Pagliarulo, Derek Tucker, Kaela Villegas, Christian Wright, Sara Brownell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K SupriyaResearch for Inclusive STEM Education Center, School of Life Sciences, and.
Christofer BangSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Jessica EbieSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Christopher PagliaruloSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Derek TuckerSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Kaela VillegasResearch for Inclusive STEM Education Center, School of Life Sciences, and.
Christian WrightResearch for Inclusive STEM Education Center, School of Life Sciences, and.
Sara BrownellResearch for Inclusive STEM Education Center, School of Life Sciences, and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of high-stakes exams in a course has been associated with gender, racial, and socioeconomic inequities. We investigated whether offering students the opportunity to retake an exam makes high-stakes exams more equitable. Following the control value theory of achievement emotions, we hypothesized that exam retakes would increase students' perceived control over their performance and decrease the value of a single exam attempt, thereby maximizing exam performance. We collected data on exam scores and experiences with retakes from three large introductory biology courses and assessed the effect of optional exam retakes on gender, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in exam scores. We found that Black/African American students and those who worked more than 20 h a week were less likely to retake exams. While exam retakes significantly improved student scores, they slightly increased racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in scores partly because of these differences in participation rates. Most students reported that retake opportunities reduced their anxiety on the initial exam attempt. Together our results suggest that optional exam retakes could be a useful tool to improve student performance and reduce anxiety associated with high-stakes exams. However, barriers to participation must be examined and reduced for retakes to reduce disparities in scores.

Indexed as

AnxietyEducational MeasurementSocial IdentificationStudentsBlack or African AmericanEmploymentEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleSocioeconomic FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID38900940
PMCPMC11440740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.