Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900817›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Image2Flow: A proof-of-concept hybrid image and graph convolutional neural network for rapid patient-specific pulmonary artery segmentation and CFD flow field calculation from 3D cardiac MRI data.

Tina Yao, Endrit Pajaziti, Michael Quail, Silvia Schievano, Jennifer Steeden, Vivek Muthurangu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tina YaoInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0470-311X
Endrit PajazitiInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael QuailInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Silvia SchievanoInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer SteedenInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9792-2022
Vivek MuthuranguInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4292-6456

Funding

British Heart Foundation NH/18/1/33511British Heart Foundation PG/17/6/32797European Research Council ERC-2017-STG-757923Heart Research UK RG2661/17/20UK Research and Innovation EP/S021612/1UK Research and Innovation MR/S032290/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can be used for non-invasive evaluation of hemodynamics. However, its routine use is limited by labor-intensive manual segmentation, CFD mesh creation, and time-consuming simulation. This study aims to train a deep learning model to both generate patient-specific volume-meshes of the pulmonary artery from 3D cardiac MRI data and directly estimate CFD flow fields. This proof-of-concept study used 135 3D cardiac MRIs from both a public and private dataset. The pulmonary arteries in the MRIs were manually segmented and converted into volume-meshes. CFD simulations were performed on ground truth meshes and interpolated onto point-point correspondent meshes to create the ground truth dataset. The dataset was split 110/10/15 for training, validation, and testing. Image2Flow, a hybrid image and graph convolutional neural network, was trained to transform a pulmonary artery template to patient-specific anatomy and CFD values, taking a specific inlet velocity as an additional input. Image2Flow was evaluated in terms of segmentation, and the accuracy of predicted CFD was assessed using node-wise comparisons. In addition, the ability of Image2Flow to respond to increasing inlet velocities was also evaluated. Image2Flow achieved excellent segmentation accuracy with a median Dice score of 0.91 (IQR: 0.86-0.92). The median node-wise normalized absolute error for pressure and velocity magnitude was 11.75% (IQR: 9.60-15.30%) and 9.90% (IQR: 8.47-11.90), respectively. Image2Flow also showed an expected response to increased inlet velocities with increasing pressure and velocity values. This proof-of-concept study has shown that it is possible to simultaneously perform patient-specific volume-mesh based segmentation and pressure and flow field estimation using Image2Flow. Image2Flow completes segmentation and CFD in ~330ms, which is ~5000 times faster than manual methods, making it more feasible in a clinical environment.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerPulmonary ArteryBlood Flow VelocityComputational BiologyDeep LearningHumansHydrodynamicsModels, CardiovascularProof of Concept Study

Identifiers

PMID38900817
PMCPMC11218942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.