Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900798›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Democratizing protein language models with parameter-efficient fine-tuning.

Samuel Sledzieski, Meghana Kshirsagar, Minkyung Baek, Rahul Dodhia, Juan Lavista Ferres, Bonnie Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel SledzieskiAI for Good Research Lab, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052.ORCID 0000-0002-0170-3029
Meghana KshirsagarAI for Good Research Lab, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052.
Minkyung BaekDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Rahul DodhiaAI for Good Research Lab, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052.
Juan Lavista FerresAI for Good Research Lab, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 98052.ORCID 0000-0002-9654-3178
Bonnie BergerComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.

Funding

Manifold representations and active learning for 21 st century biologyR35GM141861 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BERGER, BONNIE · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R35GM141861Microsoft (Microsoft Corporation) n/aNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141861NSF | National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) 2141064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics has been revolutionized by large protein language models (PLMs), which learn unsupervised representations from large corpora of sequences. These models are typically fine-tuned in a supervised setting to adapt the model to specific downstream tasks. However, the computational and memory footprint of fine-tuning (FT) large PLMs presents a barrier for many research groups with limited computational resources. Natural language processing has seen a similar explosion in the size of models, where these challenges have been addressed by methods for parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). In this work, we introduce this paradigm to proteomics through leveraging the parameter-efficient method LoRA and training new models for two important tasks: predicting protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and predicting the symmetry of homooligomer quaternary structures. We show that these approaches are competitive with traditional FT while requiring reduced memory and substantially fewer parameters. We additionally show that for the PPI prediction task, training only the classification head also remains competitive with full FT, using five orders of magnitude fewer parameters, and that each of these methods outperform state-of-the-art PPI prediction methods with substantially reduced compute. We further perform a comprehensive evaluation of the hyperparameter space, demonstrate that PEFT of PLMs is robust to variations in these hyperparameters, and elucidate where best practices for PEFT in proteomics differ from those in natural language processing. All our model adaptation and evaluation code is available open-source at https://github.com/microsoft/peft_proteomics. Thus, we provide a blueprint to democratize the power of PLM adaptation to groups with limited computational resources.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansNatural Language ProcessingProtein Interaction MappingProteinsProteinshomooligomer symmetryparameter-efficient fine-tuningprotein language modelsprotein–protein interactionsquaternary structure

Identifiers

PMID38900798
PMCPMC11214071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.