Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900791›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

MDGAs perform activity-dependent synapse type-specific suppression via distinct extracellular mechanisms.

Seungjoon Kim, Gyubin Jang, Hyeonho Kim, Dongseok Lim, Kyung Ah Han, Ji Won Um, Jaewon Ko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Localization and Functional Characterization of MDGA1 in Mouse Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. CASKIN2 mediates PTPσ-orchestrated transsynaptic mechanisms at excitatory synapses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seungjoon Kim *Department of Brain Sciences, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu 42988, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6298-5552
Gyubin Jang *Department of Brain Sciences, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu 42988, Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-3811-6792
Hyeonho KimDepartment of Brain Sciences, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu 42988, Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-2009-6619
Dongseok LimDepartment of Brain Sciences, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu 42988, Korea.ORCID 0009-0006-9521-7975
Kyung Ah HanDepartment of Brain Sciences, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu 42988, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6353-1042
Ji Won UmDepartment of Brain Sciences, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu 42988, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9355-7726
Jaewon KoDepartment of Brain Sciences, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu 42988, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9184-1574

Funding

Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST) 23-CoE-BT-01National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2022R1A3B1077206National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2022R1C1C2003499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MDGA (MAM domain containing glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor) family proteins were previously identified as synaptic suppressive factors. However, various genetic manipulations have yielded often irreconcilable results, precluding precise evaluation of MDGA functions. Here, we found that, in cultured hippocampal neurons, conditional deletion of MDGA1 and MDGA2 causes specific alterations in synapse numbers, basal synaptic transmission, and synaptic strength at GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses, respectively. Moreover, MDGA2 deletion enhanced both N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor- and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor-mediated postsynaptic responses. Strikingly, ablation of both MDGA1 and MDGA2 abolished the effect of deleting individual MDGAs that is abrogated by chronic blockade of synaptic activity. Molecular replacement experiments further showed that MDGA1 requires the meprin/A5 protein/PTPmu (MAM) domain, whereas MDGA2 acts via neuroligin-dependent and/or MAM domain-dependent pathways to regulate distinct postsynaptic properties. Together, our data demonstrate that MDGA paralogs act as unique negative regulators of activity-dependent postsynaptic organization at distinct synapse types, and cooperatively contribute to adjustment of excitation-inhibition balance.

Indexed as

HippocampusSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionAnimalsCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalCells, CulturedMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, KnockoutNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateMDGAsneural circuitsynapse formationsynaptic adhesionsynaptic suppressor

Identifiers

PMID38900791
PMCPMC11214077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.