Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900740›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Revisiting the NPcis mouse model: A new tool to model plexiform neurofibroma.

Camille Plante, Teddy Mohamad, Dhanushka Hewa Bostanthirige, Michel Renaud, Harsimran Sidhu, Michel ElChoueiry, Jean-Paul Sabo Vatasescu, Mikael Poirier, Sameh Geha, Jean-Philippe Brosseau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Camille PlanteDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomic, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Teddy MohamadDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomic, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Dhanushka Hewa BostanthirigeDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomic, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Michel RenaudDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomic, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Harsimran SidhuDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomic, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Michel ElChoueiryDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomic, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Paul Sabo VatasescuDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomic, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Mikael PoirierDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomic, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Sameh GehaDepartment of Pathology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Philippe BrosseauDepartment of Biochemistry and Functional Genomic, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5852-3507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis Type I (NF1) is a rare genetic disorder. NF1 patients frequently develop a benign tumor in peripheral nerve plexuses called plexiform neurofibroma. In the past two decades, tissue-specific Nf1 knockout mouse models were developed using commercially available tissue-specific Cre recombinase and the Nf1 flox mice to mimic neurofibroma development. However, these models develop para-spinal neurofibroma, recapitulating a rare type of neurofibroma found in NF1 patients. The NPcis mouse model developed a malignant version of neurofibroma called malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) within 3 to 6 months but intriguingly without apparent benign precursor lesion. Here, we revisited the NPcis model and discovered that about 20% display clinical signs similar to Nf1 tissue-specific knockout mice models. However, a systematic histological analysis could not explain the clinical signs we observed although we noticed lesions reminiscent of a neurofibroma in a peripheral nerve, a cutaneous neurofibroma, and para-spinal neurofibroma on rare occasions in NPcis mice. We also observed that 10% of the mice developed a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) spontaneously, coinciding with their earring tag identification. Strikingly, half of the sciatic nerves from NPcis mice developed plexiform neurofibroma within 1-6 months when intentionally injured. Thus, we provided a procedure to turn the widely used NPcis sarcoma model into a model recapitulating plexiform neurofibroma.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalNeurofibroma, PlexiformAnimalsMiceMice, KnockoutNeurofibromatosis 1Neurofibromin 1Sciatic NerveNeurofibromin 1

Identifiers

PMID38900740
PMCPMC11189233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.