ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Facilitators and barriers to community-led monitoring of health programs: Qualitative evidence from the global implementation landscape.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public Health Policy Responses to Population Aging in Mexico: A Rights-Based and Socio-Legal Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Processes and challenges of integrating nutrition assessment, counselling, and support into health systems in Uganda: a case study of Tororo district.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Chronic myeloid and lymphocytic leukemias in the elderly: public health challenges in early detection and long-term care.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Cognitive sovereignty and decolonial public health: reclaiming epistemic authority in the global AI era.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for precision malaria control: transforming surveillance, prediction, and intervention strategies.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Approaches used to monitor the effectiveness of community-led monitoring programmes: a scoping review to inform HIV programmes.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Resources for oral health in Africa.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Power, data and social accountability: defining a community-led monitoring model for strengthened health service delivery.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving the global HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria targets will require innovative strategies to deliver high quality and person-centered health services. Community-led monitoring (CLM) is a rapidly proliferating health systems strengthening intervention for improving healthcare services and documenting human rights violations, through social empowerment and political accountability. Driven in part by increasing financial support from donors, a growing number of countries are implementing CLM programs. This study aimed to identify early challenges and lessons learned from CLM implementation, with the aim of informing and improving the implementation of CLM programs and ultimately achieving greater impact on the delivery of services. Twenty-five CLM implementors representing 21 countries participated in an interview. Early generation of buy-in from diverse stakeholders was noted as critical for CLM success. Leveraging existing networks of service users and community organizations to implement CLM also helped to maximize program reach and resources. Uncertainty around CLM's purpose and roles among CLM stakeholders resulted in challenges to community leadership and ownership of programs. Respondents also described challenges with underfunded programs, especially advocacy components, and inflexible donor funding mechanisms. Critical capacity gaps remain around advocacy and electronic data collection and use. With the rapid expansion of CLM, this study serves as an important first step in characterizing challenges and successes in the CLM landscape. Successful implementation of CLM requires prioritizing community ownership and leadership, donor commitment to sustainable and reliable funding, and strengthened support of programs across the data collection and advocacy lifecycle.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.