Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900725›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Facilitators and barriers to community-led monitoring of health programs: Qualitative evidence from the global implementation landscape.

Alana R Sharp, Ngqabutho Mpofu, Elise Lankiewicz, Beatrice Ajonye, Ndivhuwo P Rambau, Stefanie Dringus, Brian Honermann, Ngozi Erondu, Asia Russell, Kenneth Mwehonge and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Resources for oral health in Africa.Frontiers in oral health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alana R SharpO'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6737-6168
Ngqabutho MpofuTreatment Action Campaign, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Elise LankiewiczAndelson Office of Public Policy, amfAR, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Beatrice AjonyeInternational Community of Women Living with HIV Eastern Africa, Kampala, Uganda.
Ndivhuwo P RambauTreatment Action Campaign, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Stefanie DringusO'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Brian HonermannAndelson Office of Public Policy, amfAR, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Ngozi EronduO'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Asia RussellHealth GAP, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Kenneth MwehongeCoalition for Health Promotion and Social Development, Kampala, Uganda.
Cláudia AguiarO'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Naïké LedanHealth GAP, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Matthew M KavanaghO'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving the global HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria targets will require innovative strategies to deliver high quality and person-centered health services. Community-led monitoring (CLM) is a rapidly proliferating health systems strengthening intervention for improving healthcare services and documenting human rights violations, through social empowerment and political accountability. Driven in part by increasing financial support from donors, a growing number of countries are implementing CLM programs. This study aimed to identify early challenges and lessons learned from CLM implementation, with the aim of informing and improving the implementation of CLM programs and ultimately achieving greater impact on the delivery of services. Twenty-five CLM implementors representing 21 countries participated in an interview. Early generation of buy-in from diverse stakeholders was noted as critical for CLM success. Leveraging existing networks of service users and community organizations to implement CLM also helped to maximize program reach and resources. Uncertainty around CLM's purpose and roles among CLM stakeholders resulted in challenges to community leadership and ownership of programs. Respondents also described challenges with underfunded programs, especially advocacy components, and inflexible donor funding mechanisms. Critical capacity gaps remain around advocacy and electronic data collection and use. With the rapid expansion of CLM, this study serves as an important first step in characterizing challenges and successes in the CLM landscape. Successful implementation of CLM requires prioritizing community ownership and leadership, donor commitment to sustainable and reliable funding, and strengthened support of programs across the data collection and advocacy lifecycle.

Identifiers

PMID38900725
PMCPMC11189247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.