Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900720›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Parrots in the wild in Polish cities.

Agnieszka Ważna, Mateusz Ciepliński, Weronika Ratajczak, Jacek Bojarski, Jan Cichocki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agnieszka WażnaDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Biological Science, University of Zielona Góra, Prof. Z. Szafrana 1, Zielona Góra, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2205-8364
Mateusz CieplińskiDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Biological Science, University of Zielona Góra, Prof. Z. Szafrana 1, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Weronika RatajczakFaculty of Biological Sciences, Student Scientific Club of Biologists, University of Zielona Góra, Prof. Z. Szafrana 1, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Jacek BojarskiInstitute of Mathematics, Center for Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Zielona Góra, Prof. Z. Szafrana 4a, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Jan CichockiDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Biological Science, University of Zielona Góra, Prof. Z. Szafrana 1, Zielona Góra, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amateur breeding of parrots as pets has contributed to many species being found in areas where they never occurred in the wild, particularly in warmer regions, but also in the temperate climates of North America and Europe. Climate change is likely to exacerbate this process. We hypothesised that parrots occurred in the wild in the cities of Poland, especially the rose-ringed parakeet, as there are reports of breeding sites in the literature. Using information on lost, found and sighted parrots posted on social media, we have analysed the extent of parrot emergence in Poland. In a period of less than two years (from October 2018, through 2019 and from June to the end of December 2021), 2,675 parrot specimens of 49 species were found in the wild. The most frequently observed species were cockatiel Nymphicus hollandicus (N = 962), budgerigar Melopsittacus undulatus (N = 884) and rose-ringed parakeet Psittacula krameri (N = 182). Parrots were most frequently observed in urban areas, in regions characterized by a higher population size, a higher income and a higher proportion of people with a university degree. Our study shows that the occurrence of parrots, especially rose-ringed parakeets in the wild, needs to be monitored as new breeding sites may appear.

Indexed as

CitiesParrotsAnimalsAnimals, WildClimate ChangePoland

Identifiers

PMID38900720
PMCPMC11189211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.