Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900555›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2024

Individual differences in emotion prediction and implications for social success.

Elyssa M Barrick, Mark A Thornton, Zidong Zhao, Diana I Tamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elyssa M BarrickDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University.ORCID 0000-0002-6659-0141
Mark A ThorntonDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University.
Zidong ZhaoDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University.
Diana I TamirDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University.

Funding

The structure and dynamics of mental state representationsR01MH114904 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TAMIR, DIANA · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social world requires people to predict others' thoughts, feelings, and actions. People who successfully predict others' emotions experience significant social advantages. What makes a person good at predicting emotions? To predict others' future emotional states, a person must know how one emotion transitions to the next. People learn how emotions transition from at least two sources: (a)

Indexed as

EmotionsIndividualitySocial PerceptionAdultAutism Spectrum DisorderFemaleHumansLonelinessMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38900555
PMCPMC11883643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.