ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Using diffusion models to generate synthetic labeled data for medical image segmentation.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffusion models vs. DCGANs for class-imbalanced lung cancer CT classification: A comparative study.Intelligence-based medicine · 2026Article
- Diffusion Models vs. DCGANs for Class-Imbalanced Lung Cancer CT Classification: A Comparative Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research-Part 5: Data management.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Synthetic Tabular Data Generation Under Horizontal Federated Learning Environments in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Case-Based Simulation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Perceptual Realism and Clinical Plausibility of AI-Generated Colon Polyp Images.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Privacy enhancing and generalizable deep learning with synthetic data for mediastinal neoplasm diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMedical image analysis has become a prominent area where machine learning has been applied. However, high-quality, publicly available data are limited either due to patient privacy laws or the time and cost required for experts to annotate images. In this retrospective study, we designed and evaluated a pipeline to generate synthetic labeled polyp images for augmenting medical image segmentation models with the aim of reducing this data scarcity.
methodsWe trained diffusion models on the HyperKvasir dataset, comprising 1000 images of polyps in the human GI tract from 2008 to 2016. Qualitative expert review, Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), and Multi-Scale Structural Similarity (MS-SSIM) were tested for evaluation. Additionally, various segmentation models were trained with the generated data and evaluated using Dice score (DS) and Intersection over Union (IoU).
resultsOur pipeline produced images more akin to real polyp images based on FID scores. Segmentation model performance also showed improvements over GAN methods when trained entirely, or partially, with synthetic data, despite requiring less compute for training. Moreover, the improvement persists when tested on different datasets, showcasing the transferability of the generated images.
conclusionsThe proposed pipeline produced realistic image and mask pairs which could reduce the need for manual data annotation when performing a machine learning task. We support this use case by showing that the methods proposed in this study enhanced segmentation model performance, as measured by Dice and IoU scores, when trained fully or partially on synthetic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38900372What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.