Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900328›Full record

SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions: a meta-analysis and pictorial review of imaging features.

Parya Valizadeh, Payam Jannatdoust, Mohammadreza Tahamtan, Soroush Soleimani Dorcheh, Fattaneh Khalaj, Hamed Ghorani, Niloofar Ayoobi Yazdi, Faeze Salahshour

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Common and Uncommon Splenic Lesions: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Parya Valizadeh *School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2022-2893
Payam Jannatdoust *School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9887-7905
Mohammadreza TahamtanSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Soroush Soleimani DorchehSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fattaneh KhalajSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed GhoraniAdvanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7839-4685
Niloofar Ayoobi YazdiAdvanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Faeze SalahshourAdvanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran. faeze.salahshoor@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0342-0006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSplenic lesions might exhibit overlapping imaging features, varying from benign entities like cysts and hemangiomas to malignancies such as lymphoma and angiosarcoma. This meta-analysis aims to delineate imaging characteristics that distinguish malignant from benign splenic lesions.

methodsAdhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies on imaging features differentiating malignant from benign splenic lesions. We extracted data on splenic pathology and imaging characteristics and assessed the methodological quality via QUADAS-2. Odds ratio meta-analyses were performed using STATA (Version 17.0, Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

resultsPortal phase hypoenhancement, hypovascular enhancement pattern, diffusion restriction, and late phase hypoenhancement, with odds ratios above 10, highly indicate malignancy. Other features suggestive of malignancy include solid morphology, lymphadenopathy, presence of perisplenic fluid, arterial hypoenhancement, hypoechogenicity on ultrasound, splenomegaly, and presence of multiple lesions. In contrast, cystic morphology, hypervascular-washout and hypervascular-persistent pattern of enhancement, late phase hyperenhancement, anechogenicity on ultrasound, portal phase hyperenhancement, well-defined borders, and calcification are in favour of benign pathology.

conclusionThe study underscores the critical role of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging in distinguishing malignant from benign splenic lesions, emphasizing the role of features like portal phase hypoenhancement and restricted diffusion in diagnosing malignancies. Additionally, the study emphasizes the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, which allows for the visualization of key contrast-enhancement patterns without the risk of ionizing radiation exposure.

Indexed as

SpleenSplenic DiseasesSplenic NeoplasmsContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansContrast MediaContrast-enhanced imagingDWIMalignancySpleenSplenic lesions

Identifiers

PMID38900328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.