Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900327›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

The importance and future of prostate MRI report templates: improving oncological care.

Benjamin Spilseth, Francesco Giganti, Silvia D Chang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin SpilsethDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolos, Minnesota, USA.
Francesco GigantiDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Silvia D ChangDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia Vancouver General Hospital, 899 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C, V5Z 1M9, Canada. Silvia.Chang@vch.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-8114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The radiologist's report is crucial for guiding care post-imaging, with ongoing advancements in report construction. Recent studies across various modalities and organ systems demonstrate enhanced clarity and communication through structured reports. This article will explain the benefits of disease-state specific reporting templates using prostate MRI as the model system. We identify key reporting components for prostate cancer detection and staging as well as imaging in active surveillance and following therapy. We discuss relevant reporting systems including PI-QUAL, PI-RADS, PRECISE, PI-RR and PI-FAB systems. Additionally, we examine optimal reporting structure including disruptive technologies such as graphical reporting and using artificial intelligence to improve report clarity and applicability.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingQuality ImprovementRadiology Information SystemsPI-RADSProstate cancerProstate MRIStructured reportTemplate report

Identifiers

PMID38900327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.