ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Pictorial review of the diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer using vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS).
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Status and Future Perspective for Bladder Cancer MR Imaging and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in Japan: Challenges and Solutions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- Histopathological Basis of Peritumoral Enhancement in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) is a standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diagnostic method for muscle-invasive bladder cancer that was published in 2018. Several studies have demonstrated that VI-RADS has high diagnostic power and reproducibility. However, reading VI-RADS requires a certain amount of expertise, and radiologists need to be aware of the various pitfalls. MRI of the bladder includes T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCEI). T2WI is excellent for understanding anatomy. DWI and DCEI show high contrast between the tumor and normal anatomical structures and are suitable for staging local tumors. Bladder tumors are classified into five categories according to their size and morphology and their positional relationship to the bladder wall based on the VI-RADS diagnostic criteria. If the T2WI, DWI, and DCEI categories are the same, the category is the VI-RADS category. If the categories do not match, the DWI category is the VI-RADS category. If image quality of DWI is not evaluable, the DCEI category is the final category. In many cases, DWI is dominant, but this does not mean that T2WI and DCEI can be omitted from the reading of the bladder. In this educational review, typical and atypical teaching cases are demonstrated, and how to resolve misdiagnosis and the limitations of VI-RADS are discussed. The most important aspect of VI-RADS reading is to practice multiparametric reading with a solid understanding of the characteristics and role of each sequence and an awareness of the various pitfalls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38900320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.