Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900313›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2024

Concordance of HIV Prevention Advocacy Reports and its Associations with HIV Protective Behaviors.

Nipher Malika, Harold D Green, Laura M Bogart, Joseph K B Matovu, David J Klein, Steven Okoboi, Violet Gwokyalya, Susan Ninsiima, Glenn J Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nipher MalikaRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA. nmalika@rand.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5887-5481
Harold D GreenDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health- Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Laura M BogartRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA.
Joseph K B MatovuMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
David J KleinRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA.
Steven OkoboiInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Violet GwokyalyaMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Susan NinsiimaInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Glenn J WagnerRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA.

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sung-Jae Lee · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Controlled Trial of Game Changers: A Group Intervention to Train HIV Clients to be Change Agents for HIV Prevention in UgandaR01MH126691 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI BOGART, LAURA M, WAGNER, GLENN JOHN · 2021 to 2025
$4.0M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer advocacy can promote HIV protective behaviors, but little is known about the concordance on prevention advocacy(PA) reports between people living with HIV(PLWH) and their social network members. We examined prevalence and correlates of such concordance, and its association with the targeted HIV protective behavior of the social network member. Data were analyzed from 193 PLWH(index participants) and their 599 social network members(alters). Kappa statistics measured concordance between index and alter reports of PA in the past 3 months. Logistic and multinomial regressions evaluated the relationship between advocacy concordance and alter condom use and HIV testing behavior and correlates of PA concordance. Advocacy concordance was observed in 0.3% of index-alter dyads for PrEP discussion, 9% for condom use, 18% for HIV testing, 26% for care engagement, and 49% for antiretroviral use discussions. Fewer indexes reported condom use(23.5% vs. 28.1%;[Formula: see text]=3.7, p=0.05) and HIV testing(30.5% vs. 50.5%; [Formula: see text]=25.3, p<0.001) PA occurring. Condom advocacy concordance was higher if the index and alter were romantic partners(OR=3.50; p=0.02), and lower if the index was 10 years younger than the alter(OR=0.23; p = 0.02). Alters had higher odds of using condoms with their main partner when both reported condom advocacy compared to dyads where neither reported advocacy(OR=3.90; p<0.001) and compared to dyads where only the index reported such advocacy(OR = 3.71; p=0.01). Age difference and relationship status impact advocacy agreement, and concordant perceptions of advocacy are linked to increased HIV protective behaviors. Alters' perceptions may be crucial for behavior change, informing strategies for improving advocacy.

Indexed as

CondomsHIV InfectionsAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdvocacyPeer GroupSafe SexSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSocial SupportHIVNetwork-based interventionsPeer-to-peer interventionsPrevention advocacySocial networks

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.