ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Partial weight-bearing following ankle fracture: what's the actual load in early recovery?
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biofeedback's Effect on Orthosis Use: Insights from Continuous Six-Week Monitoring of Ankle Fracture Loading.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Trial
- Is an Ambulatory Biofeedback Device More Effective than Instructing Partial Weight-Bearing Using a Bathroom Scale? Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial with Healthy Subjects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Trial
- Effect of Continuous Audio Biofeedback During Postoperative Partial Weight Bearing in Older Patients-An Exploratory Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates the learning efficacy for partial weight load before discharge as well as the impact of biofeedback during the learning process.
methodsWe monitored weight-bearing in 57 patients who had surgery for ankle fractures. Continuous measurements without and with biofeedback were performed in the early postoperative stage in order to, first, assess how well these patients could apply what they have learned before being discharged, and second, to examine the influence of biofeedback.
resultsUsing conventional teaching methods, only about one-third of patients (36.8% on the ground and 29.2% on the stairs) were able to maintain a satisfactory load. One-fourth of the patients did not place any weight on their leg, which was shown to be due to excessive pain at the time of the measurement (p < 0.05). A further one-fourth loaded inadequately low, while the remainder loaded excessively. Patients benefited significantly from the activation of audio-visual biofeedback in real time. As a result, loads in a target zone between 15 and 30 kg could be significantly increased (p < 0.05).
conclusionWe conclude that the majority of ankle fracture patients were unable to learn partial weight bearing in the early postoperative stage using traditional techniques. Additionally, each patient's ability to carry out a given loading varied. Using an audio-visual real-time biofeedback modality led to significantly improved performance. These findings support the proposed utility of audiovisual feedback in early rehabilitation. With the use of outpatient real-time biofeedback systems, therapists will be able to respond specifically to the needs of each individual patient.
trial registrationTrial registration: DRKS00031136, Registered 01.02.2023 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.drks.de/DRKS00031136.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38900293What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.