Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900283›Full record

Observational studyIntensive care medicine2024

Standardised and automated assessment of head computed tomography reliably predicts poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre study.

Margareta Lang, Martin Kenda, Michael Scheel, Juha Martola, Matthew Wheeler, Stephanie Owen, Mikael Johnsson, Martin Annborn, Josef Dankiewicz, Nicolas Deye and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. [Neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest and resuscitation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Update on acute brain injury.Intensive care medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Margareta Lang *Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Martin Kenda *Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael ScheelDepartment of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Juha MartolaHUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Matthew WheelerUniversity Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Stephanie OwenUniversity Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Mikael JohnssonDepartment of Radiology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Martin AnnbornDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Josef DankiewiczDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Nicolas DeyeDepartment of Medical and Toxicological Intensive Care Unit, Inserm UMR-S 942, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Joachim DüringDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Hans FribergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Thomas HallidayDepartment of Operation and Intensive Care, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Janus Christian JakobsenDepartment of Regional Health Research, The Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jean-Baptiste LascarrouMedecine Intensive Reanimation, Movement-Interactions-Performance,, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, MIP, UR 4334, 44000, Nantes, France.
Helena LevinDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Gisela LiljaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna LybeckDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Peter McGuiganRegional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Christian RylanderAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Victoria SemDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Central Hospital of Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden.
Matthew ThomasIntensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston, Bristol, UK.
Susann UllénClinical Studies Sweden‑Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Johan UndénDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Matt P WiseAdult Critical Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Tobias CronbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Johan WasséliusDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Niklas NielsenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Christoph Leithner *Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Marion Moseby-Knappe *Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. marion.moseby_knappe@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8160-5957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeApplication of standardised and automated assessments of head computed tomography (CT) for neuroprognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

methodsProspective, international, multicentre, observational study within the Targeted Hypothermia versus Targeted Normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (TTM2) trial. Routine CTs from adult unconscious patients obtained > 48 h ≤ 7 days post-arrest were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by seven international raters blinded to clinical information using a pre-published protocol. Grey-white-matter ratio (GWR) was calculated from four (GWR-4) and eight (GWR-8) regions of interest manually placed at the basal ganglia level. Additionally, GWR was obtained using an automated atlas-based approach. Prognostic accuracies for prediction of poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6) for the qualitative assessment and for the pre-defined GWR cutoff < 1.10 were calculated.

results140 unconscious patients were included; median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-76), 76% were male, and 75% had poor outcome. Standardised qualitative assessment and all GWR models predicted poor outcome with 100% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI] 90-100). Sensitivity in median was 37% for the standardised qualitative assessment, 39% for GWR-8, 30% for GWR-4 and 41% for automated GWR. GWR-8 was superior to GWR-4 regarding prognostic accuracies, intra- and interrater agreement. Overall prognostic accuracy for automated GWR (area under the curve [AUC] 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91) did not significantly differ from manually obtained GWR.

conclusionStandardised qualitative and quantitative assessments of CT are reliable and feasible methods to predict poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest. Automated GWR has the potential to make CT quantification for neuroprognostication accessible to all centres treating cardiac arrest patients.

Indexed as

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHeadHumansHypothermia, InducedMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesCardiac arrestComputed tomographyGWRHypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID38900283
PMCPMC11245448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.