ArticleEuropean radiology2024
"How I would like AI used for my imaging": children and young persons' perspectives.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing AI acceptance in radiology: a systematic review across the radiology workflow.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- AI integration in pediatric radiology: perspectives from international academic leaders.European radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in paediatric neuroradiology: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and pediatric imaging data: ethical strategies for learning and collaboration.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Children and adolescents' views on artificial intelligence in pediatric healthcare: a qualitative focus group study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Constructs Influencing Patient Perceptions of Use of AI in Medical Imaging Analysis: Systematic Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Parental and carer views on the use of AI in imaging for children: a national survey.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- [Artificial intelligence in preventive medicine for children and adolescents-applications and acceptance].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Review
- Public Understanding and Expectations of Digital Health Evidence Generation: Focus Group Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesArtificial intelligence (AI) tools are becoming more available in modern healthcare, particularly in radiology, although less attention has been paid to applications for children and young people. In the development of these, it is critical their views are heard. MATERIALS AND
methodsA national, online survey was publicised to UK schools, universities and charity partners encouraging any child or young adult to participate. The survey was "live" for one year (June 2022 to 2023). Questions about views of AI in general, and in specific circumstances (e.g. bone fractures) were asked.
resultsOne hundred and seventy-one eligible responses were received, with a mean age of 19 years (6-23 years) with representation across all 4 UK nations. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed they wanted to know the accuracy of an AI tool that was being used (122/171, 71.3%), that accuracy was more important than speed (113/171, 66.1%), and that AI should be used with human oversight (110/171, 64.3%). Many respondents (73/171, 42.7%) felt AI would be more accurate at finding problems on bone X-rays than humans, with almost all respondents who had sustained a missed fracture strongly agreeing with that sentiment (12/14, 85.7%).
conclusionsChildren and young people in our survey had positive views regarding AI, and felt it should be integrated into modern healthcare, but expressed a preference for a "medical professional in the loop" and accuracy of findings over speed. Key themes regarding information on AI performance and governance were raised and should be considered prior to future AI implementation for paediatric healthcare. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Artificial intelligence (AI) integration into clinical practice must consider all stakeholders, especially paediatric patients who have largely been ignored. Children and young people favour AI involvement with human oversight, seek assurances for safety, accuracy, and clear accountability in case of failures. KEY POINTS: Paediatric patient's needs and voices are often overlooked in AI tool design and deployment. Children and young people approved of AI, if paired with human oversight and reliability. Children and young people are stakeholders for developing and deploying AI tools in paediatrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.