Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38900254›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

Status quo of operative training in emergency surgery in Germany - results of a survey.

N Wachter, C Güsgen, C Geis, L S Penzkofer, K Oldhafer, A G Willms, Tobias Huber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N WachterDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9834-9662
C GüsgenDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-6456
C GeisDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.
L S PenzkoferDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0187-9750
K OldhaferSurgical Working Group Military and Emergency Medicine (CAMIN) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4878-265X
A G Willms *Department of General and Visceral Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-6735
Tobias Huber *Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. tobias.huber@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3219-501X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergencies and emergency surgeries are a central part of everyday surgical care in Germany. However, it is unclear how emergency surgery is practically trained in clinics on a daily basis and what training concept is underlying. Therefore, the aim of this survey study was to capture the status quo of emergency surgical training of German general and visceral surgeons.

methodsThe members of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery were surveyed online (n = 5281). The questionnaire included demographic data and expertise in surgery and assistance in emergency surgery regarding common emergency surgical operations. In addition, further training measures in emergency surgery and their support by employers were queried.

resultsOnly complete questionnaires (n = 184, response rate 3.5%) were included in the analysis. Most participants were in training (n = 69; 38%), followed by senior physicians (n = 52; 29%), specialists (n = 31; 17%) and chief physicians (n = 30; 17%). 64% of the participants were employed at university hospitals or maximum care hospitals. Regarding further training opportunities, in-clinic shock room training was most frequently used. Outside of their own clinic, the ATLS course was most frequently mentioned. Operations for cholecystitis and appendicitis as well as emergency stoma procedures are the most common emergency procedures. There was a strong difference in the frequency of operated cases depending on the level of training. For operations to treat acute abdominal traumas (hemostasis of liver and spleen, packing) as well as outside of visceral surgery, only low competence was reported. Over 90% of survey participants consider emergency surgery to be an indispensable core competence. Neither in the old (76%) nor in the new training regulations (47%) is emergency surgery adequately represented according to the participants' assessment. There was a significantly lower prevalence of the "sub-steps concept" in emergency surgery at 38% compared to elective surgery (44%). Important elements of imparting skills in emergency surgery are simulation and courses as well as operative sub-steps, according to the majority of survey participants.

conclusionThe results show that general and visceral surgeons in Germany are introduced to emergency surgery too little structured during further training and at specialist level. The survey participants had, as expected, hardly any experience in emergency surgery outside of visceral surgery but surprisingly also little experience in visceral surgical trauma care. There is a need to discuss the future organization of emergency surgical training. Adequate simulation structures and extracurricular courses could contribute to an improvement in this respect.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAdultEmergenciesFemaleGeneral SurgeryGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesEmergency surgeryMedical educationSimulationSurgerySurgical sub steps

Identifiers

PMID38900254
PMCPMC11189962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.