ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2024
Deep Learning Segmentation of Ascites on Abdominal CT Scans for Automatic Volume Quantification.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and personalised medicine in liver cancer.Journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- AI-assisted ascites volumetry for prognostic stratification in HCC treated with Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: Three questions to be answered when evaluating a super obese patient for urgent liver transplant.World journal of transplantation · 2026Article
- An artificial intelligence-based semi-quantitative diagnostic model for intra-abdominal hemorrhage based on focused assessment with sonography for trauma: A large animal experimental study.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Article
- A preclinical mouse model mimicking the ovarian cancer-induced estrogen deficiency-depression axis.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Progress in fully automated abdominal CT interpretation-an update over the past decade.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and CT in abdominal imaging: image reconstruction and beyond.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a deep learning-based automated computed tomography image segmentation and diagnostic model for infectious hydronephrosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Subcutaneous edema segmentation on abdominal CT using multi-class labels and iterative annotation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Abdominal Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Fluid Intelligence: AI's Role in Accurate Measurement of Ascites.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence research in radiation oncology: a practical guide for the clinician on concepts and methods.BJR open · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the performance of an automated deep learning method in detecting ascites and subsequently quantifying its volume in patients with liver cirrhosis and patients with ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included contrast-enhanced and noncontrast abdominal-pelvic CT scans of patients with cirrhotic ascites and patients with ovarian cancer from two institutions, National Institutes of Health (NIH) and University of Wisconsin (UofW). The model, trained on The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Cancer dataset (mean age [±SD], 60 years ± 11; 143 female), was tested on two internal datasets (NIH-LC and NIH-OV) and one external dataset (UofW-LC). Its performance was measured by the F1/Dice coefficient, SDs, and 95% CIs, focusing on ascites volume in the peritoneal cavity. Results On NIH-LC (25 patients; mean age, 59 years ± 14; 14 male) and NIH-OV (166 patients; mean age, 65 years ± 9; all female), the model achieved F1/Dice scores of 85.5% ± 6.1 (95% CI: 83.1, 87.8) and 82.6% ± 15.3 (95% CI: 76.4, 88.7), with median volume estimation errors of 19.6% (IQR, 13.2%-29.0%) and 5.3% (IQR: 2.4%-9.7%), respectively. On UofW-LC (124 patients; mean age, 46 years ± 12; 73 female), the model had a F1/Dice score of 83.0% ± 10.7 (95% CI: 79.8, 86.3) and median volume estimation error of 9.7% (IQR, 4.5%-15.1%). The model showed strong agreement with expert assessments, with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.