Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38899952›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Repeatability of a Virtual Reality Headset Perimeter in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertensive Patients.

Rafaella Nascimento E Silva, Julia A Kim, Yihao Li, Chen Chen, Anisa F Chaudhry, Andrew R Berneshawi, Miao Zhang, Adam Villarreal, Jocelyn Liu, Ann Shue and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Utility of Virtual Reality in Ophthalmology: A Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rafaella Nascimento E SilvaGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Julia A KimGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Yihao LiGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Chen ChenGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anisa F ChaudhryByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Andrew R BerneshawiByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Miao ZhangGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Adam VillarrealGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jocelyn LiuByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Ann ShueByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Dolly S ChangGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Robert T ChangByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The VisuALL S is an automated, static threshold, virtual reality-based perimeter for mobile evaluation of the visual field. We examined same-day and 3-month repeatability. Methods: Adult participants with a diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension underwent two VisuALL 24-2 Normal T- Full threshold strategy tests at baseline and one additional exam at 3 months for each eligible eye. Spearman, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the correlation of individual point sensitivities and mean deviation (MD) among three tests. Results: Eighty-eight eyes (44 participants) were included. Average age was 68.1 ± 14.3 years, and 60.7% were male. VisuALL MD was highly correlated between tests (intravisit: r = 0.89, intervisit: r = 0.82; P < 0.001 for both). Bland-Altman analysis showed an average difference in intravisit MD of -0.67 dB (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.04 to 4.71 dB) and -0.15 dB (95% CI, -8.04 to 7.73 dB) for intervisit exams. Eight-five percent of pointwise intravisit ICCs were above 0.75 (range, 0.63 to 0.93), and 65% of pointwise intervisit ICCs were above 0.75 (range, 0.55 to 0.91). Conclusions: VisuALL demonstrated high correlation of MD between tests and good repeatability for individual point sensitivities among three tests in 3 months, except at the points around the blind spot and superiorly. Translational Relevance: The preliminary reproducibility results for VisuALL are encouraging. Its portable design makes it a potentially useful tool for patients with glaucoma, enabling more frequent assessments both at home and in clinical settings.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOcular HypertensionVirtual RealityVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38899952
PMCPMC11193066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.