ArticleInternational wound journal2024
The role of split-thickness skin grafting in the treatment of vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers in a multidisciplinary wound centre.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probable pyoderma gangrenosum complicated with cutaneousFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The role of split-thickness skin grafting in the treatment of vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers in a multidisciplinary wound centre.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers are traditionally treated with immunosuppressants, and the role of surgery in the treatment of these atypical ulcers remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the need for surgical intervention as well as the outcome and safety of skin grafting in the treatment of 46 patients with vasculitic ulcers and 34 with pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers using data recorded in the validated Wound Registry. Of the 80 patients with atypical ulcers, 14% (n = 11) were treated surgically; these patients were older (p = 0.039), had lower mobility status (p = 0.002), and more often pulmonary diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, and previous arterial procedures (p = 0.007; p = 0.031; p = 0.031, respectively) than those treated conservatively. Of 181 ulcers, 15% (n = 27) were surgically treated, 78% once and 22% multiple times. During follow-up, 92.3% of both surgically and conservatively treated ulcers with available data healed. Of the surgically treated ulcers, median healing time after first surgical procedure was 96 days, and post-surgical complications were considered mild or unrelated to surgery. Our results suggest that if surgery is indicated, skin grafting is a safe and efficient treatment method provided that multidisciplinary approach is applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.