Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38899549›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Fast refacing of MR images with a generative neural network lowers re-identification risk and preserves volumetric consistency.

Nataliia Molchanova, Bénédicte Maréchal, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Tobias Kober, Till Huelnhagen, Jonas Richiardi, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nataliia MolchanovaDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7211-8863
Bénédicte MaréchalDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Philippe ThiranDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tobias KoberDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Till HuelnhagenDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jonas RichiardiDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise of open data, identifiability of individuals based on 3D renderings obtained from routine structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the head has become a growing privacy concern. To protect subject privacy, several algorithms have been developed to de-identify imaging data using blurring, defacing or refacing. Completely removing facial structures provides the best re-identification protection but can significantly impact post-processing steps, like brain morphometry. As an alternative, refacing methods that replace individual facial structures with generic templates have a lower effect on the geometry and intensity distribution of original scans, and are able to provide more consistent post-processing results by the price of higher re-identification risk and computational complexity. In the current study, we propose a novel method for anonymized face generation for defaced 3D T1-weighted scans based on a 3D conditional generative adversarial network. To evaluate the performance of the proposed de-identification tool, a comparative study was conducted between several existing defacing and refacing tools, with two different segmentation algorithms (FAST and Morphobox). The aim was to evaluate (i) impact on brain morphometry reproducibility, (ii) re-identification risk, (iii) balance between (i) and (ii), and (iv) the processing time. The proposed method takes 9 s for face generation and is suitable for recovering consistent post-processing results after defacing.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAlgorithmsBrainData AnonymizationFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleNeural Networks, ComputerNeuroimagingYoung Adultbrain morphometryconditional generative adversarial networksdefacingde‐identificationmagnetic resonance imagingprivacyre‐identification risk

Identifiers

PMID38899549
PMCPMC11187735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.