ReviewCureus2024
Disparity of the Treatment of Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Regarding Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of rural residence on clinical outcomes in SLE: a systematic review.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Brain Metastasis After Curative Resection of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates disparities in chemotherapy treatment for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between urban and rural populations. Despite advancements in NSCLC treatments enhancing survival, significant inequities persist, notably in rural areas where access to care is often limited, resulting in poorer outcomes. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we analyzed data from selected studies that compare chemotherapy access and usage between these populations from 2010 to 2024. Our findings indicate that rural patients are consistently less likely to receive advanced chemotherapy treatments than urban counterparts, with a pooled odds ratio of 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.00), suggesting a marginal but noticeable disparity. This highlights a crucial gap in healthcare provision, underscoring the need for policy interventions and improved healthcare practices to ensure equitable treatment access. This research calls for further investigation into socioeconomic and cultural factors contributing to these disparities to inform targeted improvement strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.