Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38899163›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T engineering2024

Long-Term Statistical Process Monitoring of an Ultrafiltration Water Treatment Process.

Taylor R Grimm, Amos Branch, Kyle A Thompson, Andrew Salveson, John Zhao, Darrell Johnson, Amanda S Hering, Kathryn B Newhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Taylor R GrimmDepartment of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.
Amos BranchCarollo Engineers, Inc., Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States.
Kyle A ThompsonCarollo Engineers, Inc., Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States.
Andrew SalvesonCarollo Engineers, Inc., Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States.
John ZhaoLas Virgenes Municipal Water District, Calabasas, California 91302, United States.
Darrell JohnsonLas Virgenes Municipal Water District, Calabasas, California 91302, United States.
Amanda S HeringDepartment of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.
Kathryn B NewhartDepartment of Geography and Environmental Engineering, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York 10996, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-6536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As water treatment technology has improved, the amount of available process data has substantially increased, making real-time, data-driven fault detection a reality. One shortcoming of the fault detection literature is that methods are usually evaluated by comparing their performance on hand-picked, short-term case studies, which yields no insight into long-term performance. In this work, we first evaluate multiple statistical and machine learning approaches for detrending process data. Then, we evaluate the performance of a PCA-based fault detection approach, applied to the detrended data, to monitor influent water quality, filtrate quality, and membrane fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane system for indirect potable reuse. Based on two short case studies, the adaptive lasso detrending method is selected, and the performance of the multivariate approach is evaluated over more than a year. The method is tested for different sets of three critical tuning parameters, and we find that for long-term, autonomous monitoring to be successful, these parameters should be carefully evaluated. However, in comparison with industry standards of simpler, univariate monitoring or daily pressure decay tests, multivariate monitoring produces substantial benefits in long-term testing.

Identifiers

PMID38899163
PMCPMC11184555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.