ArticleJTCVS techniques2024
Subcostal uniportal robotic anatomic lung resection: A pilot trial.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05535712 (Pilot Study of Single Port Robotic Surgery for Anatomical Lung Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pilot Study of Single Port Robotic Surgery for Anatomical Lung Resection
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perioperative outcomes and safety of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (U-RATS) for anatomic lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Approach in Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Real-World Study.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Trial
- Single-port robotic system approach for pulmonary lobectomy: our technique and preliminary results.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Initial Surgical Results of Subcostal Single-Port Robotic Lung Resection: A Comparative Analysis With the Multi-Port Robot.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Thinking Outside the Box-and the Thoracic Cage: The Rise of Subcostal Single-Port Robotic Lung Surgery.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Anatomical Lung Resection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparative Single-Center Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Less pain and earlier recovery after extra-thoracic single-port robotic lung resection: a propensity-matched comparison.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Redefining stapling in single-port thoracic surgery: initial clinical experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Initial single-center experience with robot-assisted single-port major pulmonary resection: a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A novel intercostal approach for single-port robotic right upper lobectomy: Surgical technique.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Single-port robotic segmentectomy using the da Vinci SP system for non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of SHURUI Single-Port Serpentine-Arm Robotic Surgery System in Lung Surgery: A Prospective Single-Centre Study.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Uniportal versus multiportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery pulmonary resections: a propensity score-matched analysis.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Evolution of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Study on the Original and Modified Techniques for Lung Anatomic Resections.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Outcome of anatomical versus non-anatomical lung resection for necrotizing pneumonia in children.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery typically necessitates the use of multiple ports. The new single-port robotic system (da Vinci SP system) platform is designed to perform uniportal surgery. The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the da Vinci SP system when used for anatomical lung resection. Methods: Patients diagnosed with clinical stage I lung cancer requiring anatomical lung resections were considered eligible for this trial. The primary outcome measure was the rate of conversion, whereas the secondary objective focused on assessing the incidence of perioperative complications. Results: The study included 35 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 48-74 years). Of these, 30 underwent lobectomy and 5 received segmentectomy. All surgeries were successfully performed using a subcostal approach, except for 1 patient, who required a thoracotomy conversion due to bleeding (conversion rate: 2.9%). The median docking time was 2 minutes (range, 1-8 minutes). For the 34 patients who completed uniportal surgery, the median total operating time was 194 minutes (range, 63-405 minutes), whereas the console time was 153 minutes (range, 93-267 minutes). The median number of harvested nodes was 13 (range, 5-37), while the median number of nodal stations was 6 (rang, 4-8). There were no in-hospital fatalities, and the median postoperative stay was 3 days (range, 2-12 days). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using the da Vinci SP system for anatomical lung resection through a subcostal approach. ClinicalTrialsgov identifier: NCT05535712.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.