Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38899102›Full record

ArticleJTCVS techniques2024

Robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation for persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation: Early assessment of feasibility, safety, and efficacy.

Stefano Schena, Jacob Lindemann, Anne Carlson, Trisha Wilcox, James Oujiri, Marcie Berger, Mario Gasparri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefano SchenaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Jacob LindemannDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Anne CarlsonDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Trisha WilcoxDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
James OujiriDivision of Cardiology/Electrophysiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Marcie BergerDivision of Cardiology/Electrophysiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Mario GasparriDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess feasibility, safety, and early efficacy of robotic-enhanced epicardial ablation (RE-EA) as first stage of a hybrid approach to patients with persistent (PsAF) and long-standing atrial fibrillation (LSAF). Methods: Single-center, retrospective analysis of patients with documented PsAF and LSAF who underwent RE-EA followed by catheter-guided endocardial ablation. Postoperatively, patients were monitored for major adverse events and underwent rhythm follow-up at 3 and 12 months. Results: Between January 2021 and June 2023, we performed RE-EA in 64 patients (73.5% male, CHA Conclusions: RE-EA is a feasible and safe, first-stage approach for the treatment of patients with PsAF and LSAF. It improves exposure of the intended targets, favors short hospital stay, and facilitates return to activity with satisfactory AF treatment in the short term.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationhybrid ablationleft atrial posterior wallrhythm follow-uprobotic

Identifiers

PMID38899102
PMCPMC11184487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.