Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38899046›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)

Discrepancies between self- and proxy-rated quality of life in people living with dementia.

Maresa Buchholz, Lidia Engel, Fabian Kleinke, Franka Mühlichen, Michelle Pfaff, Moritz Platen, Anika Rädke, Annelie Scharf, Niklas Weber, Neeltje van den Berg and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Caregivers' proxy assessments of health-related quality of life in patients with hematologic malignancies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mapping EQ-5D-5L Utilities in Dementia: Integrating Self and Proxy Reports.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maresa BuchholzGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4486-8632
Lidia EngelMonash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Australia.
Fabian KleinkeDepartment of Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Franka MühlichenGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Michelle PfaffGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5239-1769
Moritz PlatenGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Anika RädkeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Annelie ScharfGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Niklas WeberGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Neeltje van den BergDepartment of Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Bernhard MichalowskyGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to analyze discrepancies between self- and proxy-rated health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured with the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level survey (EQ-5D-5L), in people living with dementia (PlwD) and their caregivers on an individual response level.

methodsEQ-5D-5L, sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from baseline data of

resultsPlwD had a mean age of 80.1, nearly the half were female and 82.3% were mildly to moderately cognitively impaired. PlwD reported a higher utility index than caregiver proxies (mean 0.75 vs. 0.68, 83% of PlwD > 0.5). According to the PCHC and inconsistency approach, 95% of PlwD rated their health differently compared to proxies; 66% with divergent responses in at least three EQ-5D-5L dimensions. Nine dyads (5%) showed identical ratings. Discrepancies of one higher or lower EQ-5D-5L response represented the most frequent discrepancy (35.4%). Caregivers were two times more likely to report "moderate problems," representing the middle of the 5-point Likert scale. DISCUSSION: The central tendency bias observed in proxy-ratings could be associated with assessment uncertainties, resulting in an underestimation (overestimation) in PlwD reporting better (worse) health. This diverging trend extends the knowledge from previous studies and underlines the need for more methodological research in this area. Highlights: People living with dementia (PlwD) rate their health differently than proxies.Proxy-ratings over- or underestimate PlwD health when self-ratings are low or high.Proxies indicate a possible central tendency bias.Further research is needed to understand influencing factors.

Indexed as

dementiadiscrepancieshealth‐related quality of lifepatient‐reported outcome measuresproxy‐perspective

Identifiers

PMID38899046
PMCPMC11186300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.