Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38899012›Full record

ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2024

EEG Microstate as a Marker of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

M Rubega, E Passarotto, M Paramento, E Formaggio, S Masiero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M RubegaDepartment of NeuroscienceUniversity of Padova, Section of Rehabilitation 35128 Padova Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-3109
E PassarottoDepartment of NeuroscienceUniversity of Padova, Section of Rehabilitation 35128 Padova Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-9377
M ParamentoDepartment of NeuroscienceUniversity of Padova, Section of Rehabilitation 35128 Padova Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-0309
E FormaggioDepartment of NeuroscienceUniversity of Padova, Section of Rehabilitation 35128 Padova Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3417-0388
S MasieroDepartment of NeuroscienceUniversity of Padova, Section of Rehabilitation 35128 Padova Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0361-4898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is not yet fully understood, but multifactorial hypotheses have been proposed that include defective central nervous system (CNS) control of posture, biomechanics, and body schema alterations. To deepen CNS control of posture in AIS, electroencephalographic (EEG) activity during a simple balance task in adolescents with and without AIS was parsed into EEG microstates. Microstates are quasi-stable spatial distributions of the electric potential of the brain that last tens of milliseconds. The spatial distribution of the EEG characterised by the orientation from left-frontal to right-posterior remains stable for a greater amount of time in AIS compared to controls. This spatial distribution of EEG, commonly named in the literature as class B, has been found to be correlated with the visual resting state network. Both vision and proprioception networks provide critical information in mapping the extrapersonal environment. This neurophysiological marker probably unveils an alteration in the postural control mechanism in AIS, suggesting a higher information processing load due to the increased postural demands caused by scoliosis.

Indexed as

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosisbalancemicrostatesproprioceptionspine

Identifiers

PMID38899012
PMCPMC11186641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.