ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2024
Cerebral pseudoinfarction due to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case report.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurological complications are common in the management of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), with most patients requiring sedation and intubation, limiting the assessment of neurological function. There-fore, we must rely on advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as computed tomography angiography (CTA) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP). Because ECMO changes the normal blood flow pattern, it may interfere with the contrast medium in some special cases, leading to artifacts and ultimately mis-leading clinical decisions. CASE SUMMARY: A 61-year-old man presented to a local hospital with chest tightness and pain 1 d prior to presentation. The patient was treated with VA-ECMO after sudden car-diac and respiratory arrest at a local hospital. For further treatment, the patient was transferred to our hospital. The initial consciousness assessment was not clear, and routine CTP was performed to understand the intracranial changes, which suggested a large area of cerebral infarction on the right side; however, the cerebral oxygen was not consistent with the CTP results, and the reexamination of CTA still suggested a right cerebral infarction. To identify this difference, bedside transcranial Doppler was performed, and the blood flow on both sides was different. By reducing the ECMO flow, CTP reexamination showed that the results were normal and consistent with the clinical results. On day 3, the patient was alert and showed good limb movements.
conclusionIn patients with peripheral VA-ECMO, cerebral perfusion confirmed by CTP and CTA may lead to false cerebral infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.