Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38898629›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2024

A scoping review of cephalometric normative data in children.

Tuan Khang Nguyen, Akanksha Cambala, Manuela Hrit, Elizabeth A Zimmermann

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tuan Khang NguyenDental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4630-3916
Akanksha CambalaDental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6388-6190
Manuela HritDental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9062-2564
Elizabeth A ZimmermannDental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9927-3372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Understanding the orofacial characteristics and growth patterns in children is essential for both orthodontics and research on children with orofacial abnormalities. However, a concise resource of normative data on the size and relative position of these structures in different populations is not available. Our objective was to aggregate normative data to assess the growth of the orofacial skeletal structures in children with a well-balanced face and normal occlusion. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included longitudinal and cross-sectional studies on cephalometric measurement of skeletal tissues and a study population ≤ 18 years with a well-balanced face and normal occlusion. Key study parameters were extracted, and knowledge was synthesized. A quality appraisal was performed using a 10-point scale. Results: The final selection comprised of 12 longitudinal and 33 cross-sectional studies, the quality of which ranged from good to excellent. Our results showed that from childhood to adulthood, the length of the cranial base increased significantly while the cranial base angle remained constant; both the maxilla and mandible moved forward and downward. The profile becomes straighter with age. Conclusions: Growth patterns in children with a well-balanced face and normal occlusion follow accepted theories of growth.

Indexed as

CephalometricsNormative dataPediatric dentistry

Identifiers

PMID38898629
PMCPMC11270148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.