Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38898293›Full record

ReviewNature2024

A molecular and cellular perspective on human brain evolution and tempo.

Feline W Lindhout, Fenna M Krienen, Katherine S Pollard, Madeline A Lancaster

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Role for Astrocyte Metabolism in Species-Specific Neuronal Development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Dissecting Gene Regulatory Networks Governing Human Cortical Cell Fate.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Feline W LindhoutMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. flindhout@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5075-5434
Fenna M KrienenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1400-6820
Katherine S PollardGladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Madeline A LancasterMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. madeline.lancaster@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2324-8853

Funding

Functionally guided adult whole brain cell atlas in human and NHPUM1MH130981 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI Ed Lein, Hongkui Zeng · 2022 to 2026
$91.9M
Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/9NIMH NIH HHS UM1 MH130981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of the modern human brain was accompanied by distinct molecular and cellular specializations, which underpin our diverse cognitive abilities but also increase our susceptibility to neurological diseases. These features, some specific to humans and others shared with related species, manifest during different stages of brain development. In this multi-stage process, neural stem cells proliferate to produce a large and diverse progenitor pool, giving rise to excitatory or inhibitory neurons that integrate into circuits during further maturation. This process unfolds over varying time scales across species and has progressively become slower in the human lineage, with differences in tempo correlating with differences in brain size, cell number and diversity, and connectivity. Here we introduce the terms 'bradychrony' and 'tachycrony' to describe slowed and accelerated developmental tempos, respectively. We review how recent technical advances across disciplines, including advanced engineering of in vitro models, functional comparative genetics and high-throughput single-cell profiling, are leading to a deeper understanding of how specializations of the human brain arise during bradychronic neurodevelopment. Emerging insights point to a central role for genetics, gene-regulatory networks, cellular innovations and developmental tempo, which together contribute to the establishment of human specializations during various stages of neurodevelopment and at different points in evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrainAnimalsGene Regulatory NetworksHumansIn Vitro TechniquesNeural InhibitionNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuronsOrgan SizeSingle-Cell AnalysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID38898293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.