ArticleNature2024
'Fighting fire with fire' - using LLMs to combat LLM hallucinations.
Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for evaluating ChatGPT in biomedical association generation and verification using a RAG-enabled, cross-model majority voting workflow.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- "Hallucinations" of artificial intelligence tools misleading patients and families.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Medical large language models and systems in the clinical application of spinal diseases: Current status, challenges, and future prospects.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- A comparative study of the performance of different large language models in the Chinese National Pharmacist Licensing Examination.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Two-stage prompting framework with predefined verification steps for evaluating diagnostic reasoning tasks on two datasets.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Transforming education: tackling the two sigma problem with AI in journal clubs - a proof of concept.BDJ open · 2025Article
- Exploring the capabilities of GenAI for oral cancer consultations in remote consultations : Author.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Why we need to be careful with LLMs in medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Large language models and their big bullshit potential.Ethics and information technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38898288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.