ArticleBiochemical genetics2025
A Machine Learning Framework for Screening Plasma Cell-Associated Feature Genes to Estimate Osteoporosis Risk and Treatment Vulnerability.
Article in Biochemical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated transcriptomic analysis of COVID-19 stages and recovery: insights into key gene signatures, immune features, and diagnostic biomarkers through machine learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporosis, in which bones become fragile owing to low bone density and impaired bone mass, is a global public health concern. Bone mineral density (BMD) has been extensively evaluated for the diagnosis of low bone mass and osteoporosis. Circulating monocytes play an indispensable role in bone destruction and remodeling. This work proposed a machine learning-based framework to investigate the impact of circulating monocyte-associated genes on bone loss in osteoporosis patients. Females with discordant BMD levels were included in the GSE56815, GSE7158, GSE7429, and GSE62402 datasets. Circulating monocyte types were quantified via CIBERSORT, with subsequent selection of plasma cell-associated DEGs. Generalized linear models, random forests, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and support vector machines were adopted for feature selection. Artificial neural networks and nomograms were subsequently constructed for osteoporosis diagnosis, and the molecular machinery underlying the identified genes was explored. SVM outperformed the other tuned models; thus, the expression of several genes (DEFA4, HLA-DPB1, LCN2, HP, and GAS7) associated with osteoporosis were determined. ANNs and nomograms were proposed to robustly distinguish low and high BMDs and estimate the risk of osteoporosis. Clozapine, aspirin, pyridoxine, etc. were identified as possible treatment agents. The expression of these genes is extensively posttranscriptionally regulated by miRNAs and m
Indexed as
Identifiers
38898268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.