Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38898205›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024

Validation of a non-food or water motivated effort-based foraging task as a measure of motivational state in male mice.

Foteini Xeni, Caterina Marangoni, Megan G Jackson

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Conditioned versus innate effort-based tasks reveal divergence in antidepressant effect on motivational state in male mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Foteini XeniSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD, Bristol, UK.
Caterina MarangoniSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD, Bristol, UK.
Megan G JacksonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD, Bristol, UK. megan.jackson@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-6164

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M009122/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disorders of motivation such as apathy syndrome are highly prevalent across neurological disorders but do not yet have an agreed treatment approach. The use of translational behavioural models can provide a route through which to meaningfully screen novel drug targets. Methods that utilise food deprivation in contrived environments may lack the sensitivity to detect deficits in self-initiated behaviour, and may have limited translation to normal behaviour. Animals monitored in more naturalistic environments may display more ethologically-relevant behaviours of greater translational value. Here, we aimed to validate a novel, non-food or water motivated effort-based foraging task as a measure of motivational state in mice. In this task, the mouse can freely choose to exert effort to forage nesting material and shuttle it back to a safe and enclosed environment. The amount of nesting material foraged is used as a readout of motivational state. Acute dopaminergic modulation with haloperidol, amphetamine and methylphenidate, and two phenotypic models known to induce motivational deficits (healthy ageing and chronic administration of corticosterone) were used to validate this task. Consistent with other effort-based decision-making tasks we find that foraging behaviour is sensitive to acute modulation of dopaminergic transmission. We find that both phenotypic models induce differing deficits in various aspects of foraging behaviour suggesting that the task may be used to parse different behavioural profiles from distinct disease phenotypes. Thus, without requiring extended training periods or physiological deprivation, this task may represent a refined and translational preclinical measure of motivation.

Indexed as

MotivationAmphetamineAnimalsCorticosteroneFeeding BehaviorHaloperidolMaleMethylphenidateMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAmphetamineCorticosteroneHaloperidolMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID38898205
PMCPMC11479259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.